Price (USD)
Close callDaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
DaVinci MIQRO-C
XMAX Ace
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DaVinci MIQRO-C and XMAX Ace are both budget / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($99 vs $110). XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
17
Different Specs
16
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
6%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX Ace
$110
Heat Up Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
DaVinci MIQRO-C
176°C - 221°C
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~0.25g
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Removable 18350 battery
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
900mAh
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Battery Life
DaVinci MIQRO-C
—
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
DaVinci MIQRO-C
USB-C
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Charge Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~90 minutes
XMAX Ace
—
Pass-Through Charging
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Yes
XMAX Ace
—
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DaVinci MIQRO-C | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $99 | $110 |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 176°C - 221°C | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Removable 18350 battery | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | — | <10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | — |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular (4 stages) | — |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | — |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
The biggest practical difference is heat-up speed: the XMAX Ace is ready in ~20 seconds versus ~40 seconds on the DaVinci MIQRO-C, which changes whether it feels on-demand or scheduled.
XMAX Ace reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the DaVinci MIQRO-C takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the XMAX Ace, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Yes, only the DaVinci MIQRO-C supports pass-through charging. The XMAX Ace has to finish charging before you can use it.
Listed prices are close: $99 for the DaVinci MIQRO-C versus $110 for the XMAX Ace. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
DaVinci MIQRO-C lists a chamber capacity of ~0.25g; the XMAX Ace lists 0.2-0.3g.
XMAX Ace covers 100°C - 255°C, a wider band than the DaVinci MIQRO-C at 176°C - 221°C. A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
DaVinci MIQRO-C is the better fit for microdosing in our database, typically thanks to a smaller chamber, finer temperature control, or both.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.