Price (USD)
Close callDaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
DaVinci Tech $99
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
DaVinci MIQRO-C and XMAX Ace are both budget / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($99 vs $110). XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX Ace
$110
Heat Up Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
DaVinci MIQRO-C
176°C - 221°C
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~0.25g
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Removable 18350 battery
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
900mAh
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Battery Life
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~30 minutes
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
DaVinci MIQRO-C
USB-C
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Modular (4 stages)
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Ceramic (Glass-Lined)
XMAX Ace
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DaVinci MIQRO-C | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $99 | $110 |
| Device Type | — | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 176°C - 221°C | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Removable 18350 battery | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~30 minutes | <10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | — |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 80x34x23mm | — |
| Weight | 87g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular (4 stages) | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic (Glass-Lined) | Ceramic |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2023 | — |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 5 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heat-up speed: the XMAX Ace is ready in ~20 seconds versus ~40 seconds on the DaVinci MIQRO-C, which changes whether it feels on-demand or scheduled.
XMAX Ace reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the DaVinci MIQRO-C takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the XMAX Ace, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Listed prices are close: $99 for the DaVinci MIQRO-C versus $110 for the XMAX Ace. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
DaVinci MIQRO-C controls heat with modular (4 stages), while the XMAX Ace uses digital (precise). XMAX Ace gives you finer per-degree control.
DaVinci MIQRO-C lists a chamber capacity of ~0.25g; the XMAX Ace lists 0.2-0.3g.
DaVinci MIQRO-C's spec sheet lists ~30 minutes; the XMAX Ace lists <10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
XMAX Ace covers 100°C - 255°C, a wider band than the DaVinci MIQRO-C at 176°C - 221°C. A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.