Price (USD)
Close callXMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Starry 4
$99
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
XMAX Starry 4
XMAX $99
XMAX Ace and XMAX Starry 4 are both conduction / portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($110 vs $99). Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
13
Shared Specs
13
Overall Overlap
50%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Starry 4
$99
Pricing is very close between both devices.
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
XMAX Ace
Conduction
XMAX Starry 4
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Starry 4
$99
Heat Up Time
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
Temperature Range
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
XMAX Starry 4
100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉)
Chamber Capacity
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
XMAX Starry 4
0.4g
Battery Capacity
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
XMAX Starry 4
2550mAh
Battery Life
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
XMAX Starry 4
~60 minutes
Charging
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
XMAX Starry 4
USB-C
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XMAX Ace | XMAX Starry 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $110 | $99 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 100°C - 255°C | 100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.2-0.3g | 0.4g |
| Battery Type | 18650 | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 2550mAh |
| Battery Life | <10 sessions | ~60 minutes |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | ~90 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 115.9 x 37.5 x 24mm |
| Weight | — | ~137g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Brand | XMAX | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | OLED | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | Yes |
| Manufacturer | TopGreen Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2023 |
| Replaceable Battery | Yes | Yes |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 13 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX Starry 4 reaches session-ready temperature in ~15 seconds, while the XMAX Ace takes ~20 seconds. That's roughly 5 seconds quicker on the XMAX Starry 4, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
XMAX Starry 4 has the larger chamber at 0.4g, versus 0.2-0.3g on the XMAX Ace. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $110 for the XMAX Ace versus $99 for the XMAX Starry 4. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX Starry 4 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX Ace is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
XMAX Ace's spec sheet lists <10 sessions; the XMAX Starry 4 lists ~60 minutes. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
XMAX Starry 4 charges over USB-C; the XMAX Ace uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.