Price (USD)
Close callDaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
DaVinci MIQRO-C
XMAX Starry V3
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DaVinci MIQRO-C and XMAX Starry V3 are both budget / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($99 vs $100). XMAX Starry V3 has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
19
Different Specs
17
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
11%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Pricing is very close between both devices.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
XMAX Starry V3 has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Heat Up Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
Temperature Range
DaVinci MIQRO-C
176°C - 221°C
XMAX Starry V3
212°F - 464°F
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~0.25g
XMAX Starry V3
—
Battery Type
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Removable 18350 battery
XMAX Starry V3
18650
Battery Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
900mAh
XMAX Starry V3
2900mAh
Battery Life
DaVinci MIQRO-C
—
XMAX Starry V3
60-80 minutes
Charging
DaVinci MIQRO-C
USB-C
XMAX Starry V3
Micro USB
Charge Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~90 minutes
XMAX Starry V3
90-120 minutes
Dimensions
DaVinci MIQRO-C
—
XMAX Starry V3
11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DaVinci MIQRO-C | XMAX Starry V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $99 | $100 |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 176°C - 221°C | 212°F - 464°F |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | — |
| Battery Type | Removable 18350 battery | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | 2900mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 60-80 minutes |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | 90-120 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm |
| Power Adjustment | Modular (4 stages) | — |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | — |
| Chamber Material | — | Ceramic |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 17 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX Starry V3 reaches session-ready temperature in ~30 seconds, while the DaVinci MIQRO-C takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the XMAX Starry V3, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Listed prices are close: $99 for the DaVinci MIQRO-C versus $100 for the XMAX Starry V3. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
DaVinci MIQRO-C fully charges in ~90 minutes, ahead of 90-120 minutes on the XMAX Starry V3.
Both devices support pass-through charging, so you can keep vaping while they're plugged in.
XMAX Starry V3 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the DaVinci MIQRO-C is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
DaVinci MIQRO-C is the better fit for microdosing in our database, typically thanks to a smaller chamber, finer temperature control, or both.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.