Price (USD)
XMAX Daboo edgeXMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Daboo
$49
XMAX Daboo is typically around $61 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
XMAX Daboo
XMAX $49
XMAX Ace and XMAX Daboo are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Daboo is usually the lower-cost pick at $49, around $61 below XMAX Ace. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
30
Different Specs
26
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
13%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Daboo
$49
XMAX Daboo is typically around $61 lower.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Daboo
$49
Temperature Range
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
XMAX Daboo
285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F)
Chamber Capacity
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
XMAX Daboo
N/A
Battery Type
XMAX Ace
18650
XMAX Daboo
Internal
Battery Capacity
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
XMAX Daboo
650mAh
Charging
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
XMAX Daboo
USB-C
Power Adjustment
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
XMAX Daboo
Modular - 3 Stages
Session Style
XMAX Ace
Session
XMAX Daboo
Both
Warranty
XMAX Ace
1 year
XMAX Daboo
6 months
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XMAX Ace | XMAX Daboo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $110 | $49 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 100°C - 255°C | 285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.2-0.3g | N/A |
| Battery Type | 18650 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 650mAh |
| Battery Life | <10 sessions | — |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | ~1 Hour |
| Dimensions | — | 166.5x38.5x22mm |
| Weight | — | ~231g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | — |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | XMAX | XMAX |
| 510 Compatible | — | Yes |
| Cartridge Resistance Support | — | 0.5-2.0Ω |
| Coil Type | — | Porous Quartz Coil |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | OLED | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Manufacturer | TopGreen Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Operating Voltage | — | 3.3-4.2V |
| Recommended Charger | — | 5V/1A |
| Replaceable Battery | Yes | — |
| Session Style | Session | Both |
| Warranty | 1 year | 6 months |
| Water Filtration | — | Yes |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 26 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX Daboo is the cheaper option at $49 compared with $110 for the XMAX Ace, about $61 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX Ace uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX Daboo has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
XMAX Ace controls heat with digital (precise), while the XMAX Daboo uses modular - 3 stages. XMAX Ace gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX Ace lists a chamber capacity of 0.2-0.3g; the XMAX Daboo lists N/A.
XMAX Ace covers 100°C - 255°C, a wider band than the XMAX Daboo at 285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F). A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
XMAX Daboo charges over USB-C; the XMAX Ace uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.