Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeXMAX Ace
$110
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $21 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
XMAX Ace and XMAX QOMO are both conduction / portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $21 below XMAX Ace. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
16
Shared Specs
8
Overall Overlap
33%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $21 lower.
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
XMAX Ace
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX QOMO
$89
Temperature Range
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
XMAX Ace
18650
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Power Adjustment
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XMAX Ace | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $110 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 100°C - 255°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.2-0.3g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | 18650 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | <10 sessions | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | — | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | XMAX | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | OLED | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Manufacturer | TopGreen Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2020 |
| Replaceable Battery | Yes | — |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 16 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $110 for the XMAX Ace, about $21 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX Ace has the larger chamber at 0.2-0.3g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
XMAX Ace uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX QOMO has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Heat-up times are very close: ~20 seconds on the XMAX Ace and ~20 seconds on the XMAX QOMO. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
XMAX Ace controls heat with digital (precise), while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. XMAX Ace gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX Ace's spec sheet lists <10 sessions; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.