Price (USD)
Close callXMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
XMAX Starry V3
XMAX from $85.95
XMAX Ace and XMAX Starry V3 are both conduction / portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($110 vs $100). XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
11
Shared Specs
15
Overall Overlap
58%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Pricing is very close between both devices.
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
XMAX Ace
Conduction
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Heat Up Time
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
Temperature Range
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
XMAX Starry V3
212°F - 464°F
Chamber Capacity
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
XMAX Starry V3
0.3g
Battery Life
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
XMAX Starry V3
60-80 minutes
Current price
$85.95
at VPM
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages and were last checked Aug 27, 2026; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XMAX Ace | XMAX Starry V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $110 | $100 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 100°C - 255°C | 212°F - 464°F |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.2-0.3g | 0.3g |
| Battery Type | 18650 | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | <10 sessions | 60-80 minutes |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | — | 90-120 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm |
| Weight | — | 120g |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Brand | XMAX | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | No |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | OLED | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | Yes |
| Manufacturer | TopGreen Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | — | 2019 |
| Replaceable Battery | Yes | Yes |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 11 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX Ace reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the XMAX Starry V3 takes ~30 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the XMAX Ace, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
XMAX Starry V3 has the larger chamber at 0.3g, versus 0.2-0.3g on the XMAX Ace. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $110 for the XMAX Ace versus $100 for the XMAX Starry V3. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX Starry V3 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX Ace is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
XMAX Ace's spec sheet lists <10 sessions; the XMAX Starry V3 lists 60-80 minutes. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Yes, both are from XMAX, which usually means similar build quality, support, and accessory ecosystems.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.