Price (USD)
Close callDaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX Starry 4
$99
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
DaVinci MIQRO-C
XMAX Starry 4
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DaVinci MIQRO-C and XMAX Starry 4 are both budget / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($99 vs $99). XMAX Starry 4 has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
18
Different Specs
14
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
22%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX Starry 4
$99
Pricing is very close between both devices.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
XMAX Starry 4 has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
XMAX Starry 4
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Heat Up Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
Temperature Range
DaVinci MIQRO-C
176°C - 221°C
XMAX Starry 4
100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉)
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~0.25g
XMAX Starry 4
—
Battery Type
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Removable 18350 battery
XMAX Starry 4
18650
Battery Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
900mAh
XMAX Starry 4
2550mAh
Charge Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~90 minutes
XMAX Starry 4
—
Dimensions
DaVinci MIQRO-C
—
XMAX Starry 4
115.9 x 37.5 x 24mm
Power Adjustment
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Modular (4 stages)
XMAX Starry 4
—
Brand
DaVinci MIQRO-C
DaVinci Tech
XMAX Starry 4
—
Chamber Material
DaVinci MIQRO-C
—
XMAX Starry 4
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DaVinci MIQRO-C | XMAX Starry 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $99 | $99 |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 176°C - 221°C | 100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | — |
| Battery Type | Removable 18350 battery | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | 2550mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | — |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 115.9 x 37.5 x 24mm |
| Power Adjustment | Modular (4 stages) | — |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | — |
| Chamber Material | — | Ceramic |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
The biggest practical difference is heat-up speed: the XMAX Starry 4 is ready in ~15 seconds versus ~40 seconds on the DaVinci MIQRO-C, which changes whether it feels on-demand or scheduled.
XMAX Starry 4 reaches session-ready temperature in ~15 seconds, while the DaVinci MIQRO-C takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 25 seconds quicker on the XMAX Starry 4, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Listed prices are close: $99 for the DaVinci MIQRO-C versus $99 for the XMAX Starry 4. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Both devices support pass-through charging, so you can keep vaping while they're plugged in.
XMAX Starry 4 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the DaVinci MIQRO-C is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
DaVinci MIQRO-C is the better fit for microdosing in our database, typically thanks to a smaller chamber, finer temperature control, or both.
Across the 18 specs we line up, they share 4 and differ on 14, an overlap of about 22%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.