Price (USD)
Close callPAX Plus
$125
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
PAX Plus
PAX Labs $125
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
PAX Plus and XMAX Ace are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($125 vs $110). XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
12%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
PAX Plus
$125
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
PAX Plus
<30 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
PAX Plus
Conduction
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
PAX Plus
$125
XMAX Ace
$110
Heat Up Time
PAX Plus
<30 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
PAX Plus
360°F - 420°F
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
PAX Plus
0.25g - 0.5g
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
PAX Plus
Internal 18650
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
PAX Plus
3300mAh (internal)
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Battery Life
PAX Plus
2+ hours
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
PAX Plus
Magnetic dock via USB, under ~120 minutes
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
PAX Plus
Stealth, Efficiency, Flavor, Boost modes
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
PAX Plus
Stainless Steel
XMAX Ace
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | PAX Plus | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $125 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | <30 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 360°F - 420°F | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.25g - 0.5g | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Internal 18650 | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 3300mAh (internal) | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | 2+ hours | <10 sessions |
| Charging | Magnetic dock via USB, under ~120 minutes | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 2-3 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm | — |
| Weight | 91 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Stealth, Efficiency, Flavor, Boost modes | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Supports concentrate insert (Complete Kit) | — |
| Brand | PAX Labs | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2022 | — |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 10 years | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 22 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX Ace reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the PAX Plus takes <30 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the XMAX Ace, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
PAX Plus has the larger chamber at 0.25g - 0.5g, versus 0.2-0.3g on the XMAX Ace. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $125 for the PAX Plus versus $110 for the XMAX Ace. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX Ace uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The PAX Plus has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
PAX Plus controls heat with stealth, efficiency, flavor, boost modes, while the XMAX Ace uses digital (precise). XMAX Ace gives you finer per-degree control.
PAX Plus is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX Ace is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.