Price (USD)
XMAX Ace edgePAX 3
$250
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $140 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
PAX 3
PAX Labs $250
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
PAX 3 and XMAX Ace are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Ace is usually the lower-cost pick at $110, around $140 below PAX 3. XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
8%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
PAX 3
$250
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $140 lower.
PAX 3
<30 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
PAX 3
Conduction
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
PAX 3
$250
XMAX Ace
$110
Heat Up Time
PAX 3
<30 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
PAX 3
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
PAX 3
<0.35 grams
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
PAX 3
Internal 18650
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
PAX 3
3500mAh
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Battery Life
PAX 3
~90 minutes
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
PAX 3
Proprietary Dock
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
PAX 3
Modular - 4 stages
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
PAX 3
Stainless Steel
XMAX Ace
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | PAX 3 | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | <30 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | <0.35 grams | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Internal 18650 | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 3500mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~90 minutes | <10 sessions |
| Charging | Proprietary Dock | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | — |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm | — |
| Weight | ~93 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 stages | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | PAX Labs | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2016 | — |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 10 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Ace sits at $110 while the PAX 3 is $250, a gap of about $140 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Ace is the cheaper option at $110 compared with $250 for the PAX 3, about $140 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX Ace reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the PAX 3 takes <30 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the XMAX Ace, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
PAX 3 has the larger chamber at <0.35 grams, versus 0.2-0.3g on the XMAX Ace. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
XMAX Ace uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The PAX 3 has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
PAX 3 controls heat with modular - 4 stages, while the XMAX Ace uses digital (precise). XMAX Ace gives you finer per-degree control.
PAX 3 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX Ace is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.