Price (USD)
Close callAUXO Celsius
$250
PAX 3
$250
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Celsius
PAX 3
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and PAX 3 are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($250 vs $250). AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
9%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
PAX 3
$250
Pricing is very close between both devices.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
PAX 3
<30 seconds
AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX 3
~93 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
PAX 3
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
PAX 3
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
PAX 3
<30 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX 3
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX 3
<0.35 grams
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
PAX 3
3500mAh
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
PAX 3
—
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
PAX 3
~90 minutes
Bluetooth / App
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX 3
Yes
Dimensions
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX 3
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
Weight
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX 3
~93 grams
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | PAX 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $250 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | <30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | <0.35 grams |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 3500mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | ~90 minutes |
| Bluetooth / App | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm |
| Weight | — | ~93 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Modular - 4 stages |
| Oven Type | Quarts | — |
| Brand | AUXO | PAX Labs |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: AUXO Celsius runs hybrid (primarily conduction) while PAX 3 runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
AUXO Celsius reaches session-ready temperature in 6-30 seconds, while the PAX 3 takes <30 seconds. That's roughly 12 seconds quicker on the AUXO Celsius, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
AUXO Celsius uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the PAX 3 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Listed prices are close: $250 for the AUXO Celsius versus $250 for the PAX 3. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Only the PAX 3 pairs with a companion app. The AUXO Celsius relies entirely on its on-device controls.
Only the AUXO Celsius supports concentrates out of the box. The PAX 3 is dry-herb-only by design.
AUXO Celsius controls heat with modular - 4 stages (and an app controlled custom mode), while the PAX 3 uses modular - 4 stages. AUXO Celsius gives you finer per-degree control.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.