Price (USD)
XMAX Ace edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $140 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Celsius
XMAX Ace
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and XMAX Ace are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Ace is usually the lower-cost pick at $110, around $140 below AUXO Celsius. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $140 lower.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX Ace
$110
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
XMAX Ace
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Battery Life
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | — | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | — | <10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | — |
| Oven Type | Quarts | — |
| Brand | AUXO | — |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Ace sits at $110 while the AUXO Celsius is $250, a gap of about $140 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Ace is the cheaper option at $110 compared with $250 for the AUXO Celsius, about $140 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
AUXO Celsius uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the XMAX Ace uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Heat-up times are very close: 6-30 seconds on the AUXO Celsius and ~20 seconds on the XMAX Ace. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
Only the AUXO Celsius supports concentrates out of the box. The XMAX Ace is dry-herb-only by design.
AUXO Celsius is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX Ace is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
AUXO Celsius charges over USB-C; the XMAX Ace uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.