Price (USD)
XMAX Ace edgeVEAZY
$248
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $138 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
VEAZY
Storz & Bickel $248
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
VEAZY and XMAX Ace are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Ace is usually the lower-cost pick at $110, around $138 below VEAZY. XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
VEAZY
$248
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $138 lower.
VEAZY
~40 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
VEAZY
Hybrid Convection
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
VEAZY
$248
XMAX Ace
$110
Heating Type
VEAZY
Hybrid Convection
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heat Up Time
VEAZY
~40 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
VEAZY
40°C - 210°C
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
VEAZY
~0.15g
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
VEAZY
Internal
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Life
VEAZY
~40 minutes
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
VEAZY
USB-C
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
VEAZY
Digital
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
VEAZY
Ceramic-Coated
XMAX Ace
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | VEAZY | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $248 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 40°C - 210°C | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.15g | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Internal | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~40 minutes | <10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | — |
| Dimensions | 134x37x35mm | — |
| Weight | 134g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic-Coated | Ceramic |
| Brand | Storz & Bickel | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | — |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2025 | — |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Ace sits at $110 while the VEAZY is $248, a gap of about $138 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Ace is the cheaper option at $110 compared with $248 for the VEAZY, about $138 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX Ace reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the VEAZY takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the XMAX Ace, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
VEAZY uses hybrid convection heating, while the XMAX Ace uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX Ace has the larger chamber at 0.2-0.3g, versus ~0.15g on the VEAZY. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
XMAX Ace uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The VEAZY has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
VEAZY's spec sheet lists ~40 minutes; the XMAX Ace lists <10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.