Price (USD)
Close callPOTV ONE
$100
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
POTV ONE
Planet of the Vapes $100
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
POTV ONE and XMAX Ace are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($100 vs $110). XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
5
Overall Overlap
21%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
POTV ONE
$100
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
POTV ONE
30-40 Seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
POTV ONE
Convection
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
POTV ONE
$100
XMAX Ace
$110
Heating Type
POTV ONE
Convection
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heat Up Time
POTV ONE
30-40 Seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
POTV ONE
160-221°C (320-430°F)
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
POTV ONE
0.10g - 0.15g
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
POTV ONE
Internal
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
POTV ONE
1600mAh
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Battery Life
POTV ONE
30-40 Minutes
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Chamber Material
POTV ONE
Titanium
XMAX Ace
Ceramic
Brand
POTV ONE
Planet of the Vapes
XMAX Ace
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | POTV ONE | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $100 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 30-40 Seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 160-221°C (320-430°F) | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.10g - 0.15g | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Internal | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 1600mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | 30-40 Minutes | <10 sessions |
| Charging | Micro-USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~90 Minutes | — |
| Dimensions | 8.1x5x2.7cm | — |
| Weight | ~130 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Titanium | Ceramic |
| Brand | Planet of the Vapes | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2019 | — |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: POTV ONE runs convection while XMAX Ace runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX Ace reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the POTV ONE takes 30-40 Seconds. That's roughly 15 seconds quicker on the XMAX Ace, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
POTV ONE uses convection heating, while the XMAX Ace uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX Ace has the larger chamber at 0.2-0.3g, versus 0.10g - 0.15g on the POTV ONE. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $100 for the POTV ONE versus $110 for the XMAX Ace. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX Ace uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The POTV ONE has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
POTV ONE's spec sheet lists 30-40 Minutes; the XMAX Ace lists <10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.