Price (USD)
Close callLinx Eden
$100
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Eden
Linx Vapor $100
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
Linx Eden and XMAX Ace are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($100 vs $110). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
13%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Linx Eden
Convection
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Eden
$100
XMAX Ace
$110
Heating Type
Linx Eden
Convection
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Temperature Range
Linx Eden
360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C)
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
Linx Eden
0.15g - 0.25g
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
Linx Eden
Internal
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
Linx Eden
2500mAh
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Power Adjustment
Linx Eden
4 Preset Modes
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Linx Eden
Ceramic & Quartz
XMAX Ace
Ceramic
Brand
Linx Eden
Linx Vapor
XMAX Ace
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Linx Eden | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $100 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 360°F - 430°F (182°C - 221°C) | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.15g - 0.25g | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Internal | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 2500mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | — | <10 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 3 - 4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 24 x 130mm | — |
| Weight | 116 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | 4 Preset Modes | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic & Quartz | Ceramic |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2019 | — |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Linx Eden runs convection while XMAX Ace runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Linx Eden uses convection heating, while the XMAX Ace uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX Ace has the larger chamber at 0.2-0.3g, versus 0.15g - 0.25g on the Linx Eden. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $100 for the Linx Eden versus $110 for the XMAX Ace. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX Ace uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Linx Eden has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Linx Eden controls heat with 4 preset modes, while the XMAX Ace uses digital (precise). XMAX Ace gives you finer per-degree control.
Linx Eden is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX Ace is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.