Price (USD)
XMAX Ace edgeLinx Apollo
$260
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $150 lower.
VS
Linx Apollo vs XMAX Ace
Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
Linx Apollo and XMAX Ace are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Ace is usually the lower-cost pick at $110, around $150 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
17
Different Specs
16
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
6%
Shared Traits
PortableElectronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Close / ContextualLinx Apollo
—
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Weight
Close / ContextualLinx Apollo
150 grams
XMAX Ace
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Heating Style
Close / ContextualLinx Apollo
—
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
XMAX Ace
$110
Heating Type
Linx Apollo
—
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Linx Apollo
—
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
—
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
—
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
—
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Life
Linx Apollo
—
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
Linx Apollo
—
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Dimensions
Linx Apollo
60 x 40 x 40mm
XMAX Ace
—
Weight
Linx Apollo
150 grams
XMAX Ace
—
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward concentrates sessions.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose XMAX Ace if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($110 vs $260).
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction and budget sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (16 differences, 1 overlaps)
| Specification | Linx Apollo | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $260 | $110 |
| Heating Type diff | — | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time diff | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity diff | — | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type diff | — | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life diff | — | <10 sessions |
| Charging diff | — | Micro USB |
| Dimensions diff | 60 x 40 x 40mm | — |
| Weight diff | 150 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages | — |
| Brand diff | Linx Vapor | — |
| Display Type diff | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback diff | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery diff | — | Yes |
Comparison FAQs
Is Linx Apollo better than XMAX Ace?
Neither is universally better. Linx Apollo fits some priorities, while XMAX Ace fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
Which is cheaper: Linx Apollo or XMAX Ace?
XMAX Ace is listed lower ($110) compared with Linx Apollo ($260), but live retailer pricing can change.
Which heats up faster between Linx Apollo and XMAX Ace?
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Need a Different Matchup?
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.