Price (USD)
XMAX Ace edgeLinx Apollo
$190
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $80 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Linx Apollo vs XMAX Ace
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $190
VS
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
Editorial Summary
Linx Apollo and XMAX Ace are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Ace is usually the lower-cost pick at $110, around $80 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
5
Overall Overlap
20%
Shared Traits
Portable Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$190
XMAX Ace
$110
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
N/A
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
Internal
XMAX Ace
18650
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Linx Apollo
Quartz
XMAX Ace
Ceramic
Brand
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
XMAX Ace
XMAX
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward concentrates sessions.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose XMAX Ace if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($110 vs $190).
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction and budget sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
20 differ 5 shared
| Specification | Linx Apollo | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $190 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | — | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Internal | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | <10 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | — |
| Weight | 150 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Linx Apollo and the XMAX Ace?
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 20 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Which is cheaper, the Linx Apollo or the XMAX Ace?
XMAX Ace is the cheaper option at $110 compared with $190 for the Linx Apollo, about $80 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Can I swap the batteries on the Linx Apollo or the XMAX Ace?
XMAX Ace uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Linx Apollo has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Can I set custom temperatures on the Linx Apollo or the XMAX Ace?
Linx Apollo controls heat with modular - 4 stages, while the XMAX Ace uses digital (precise). XMAX Ace gives you finer per-degree control.
How much flower do the Linx Apollo and XMAX Ace hold?
Linx Apollo lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the XMAX Ace lists 0.2-0.3g.
How similar are the Linx Apollo and the XMAX Ace?
Across the 25 specs we line up, they share 5 and differ on 20, an overlap of about 20%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.