Price (USD)
XMAX Ace edgeLinx Apollo
$260
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $150 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Linx Apollo vs XMAX Ace
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor $260
VS
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
Editorial Summary
Linx Apollo and XMAX Ace are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Ace is usually the lower-cost pick at $110, around $150 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
5
Overall Overlap
20%
Shared Traits
Portable Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Linx Apollo
$260
XMAX Ace
$110
Temperature Range
Linx Apollo
220°F - 428°F
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
Linx Apollo
N/A
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
Linx Apollo
Internal
XMAX Ace
18650
Power Adjustment
Linx Apollo
Modular - 4 Stages
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Linx Apollo
Quartz
XMAX Ace
Ceramic
Brand
Linx Apollo
Linx Vapor
XMAX Ace
XMAX
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward concentrates sessions.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose XMAX Ace if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($110 vs $260).
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward conduction and budget sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
20 differ 5 shared
| Specification | Linx Apollo | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $260 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | — | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 220°F - 428°F | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Internal | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~10 sessions | <10 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 3-4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 60 x 40 x 40mm | — |
| Weight | 150 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Linx Vapor | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the Linx Apollo and the XMAX Ace?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Ace sits at $110 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $150 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the Linx Apollo or the XMAX Ace?
XMAX Ace is the cheaper option at $110 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $150 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Can I swap the batteries on the Linx Apollo or the XMAX Ace?
XMAX Ace uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Linx Apollo has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Can I set custom temperatures on the Linx Apollo or the XMAX Ace?
Linx Apollo controls heat with modular - 4 stages, while the XMAX Ace uses digital (precise). XMAX Ace gives you finer per-degree control.
How much flower do the Linx Apollo and XMAX Ace hold?
Linx Apollo lists a chamber capacity of N/A; the XMAX Ace lists 0.2-0.3g.
How similar are the Linx Apollo and the XMAX Ace?
Across the 25 specs we line up, they share 5 and differ on 20, an overlap of about 20%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.