Price (USD)
Close callDaVinci MIQRO
$99
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
DaVinci MIQRO
XMAX Ace
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DaVinci MIQRO and XMAX Ace are both budget / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($99 vs $110). XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
16
Different Specs
14
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
13%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DaVinci MIQRO
$99
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
DaVinci MIQRO
~40 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
DaVinci MIQRO
Conduction
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO
$99
XMAX Ace
$110
Heat Up Time
DaVinci MIQRO
~40 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
DaVinci MIQRO
170°C - 230°C
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO
~0.3g
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
DaVinci MIQRO
Removable 18350 battery
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO
—
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Battery Life
DaVinci MIQRO
—
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charge Time
DaVinci MIQRO
~2 hours
XMAX Ace
—
Power Adjustment
DaVinci MIQRO
Digital Control
XMAX Ace
—
Brand
DaVinci MIQRO
DaVinci Tech
XMAX Ace
—
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DaVinci MIQRO | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $99 | $110 |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 170°C - 230°C | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.3g | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Removable 18350 battery | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | — | <10 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~2 hours | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | — |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | — |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
The biggest practical difference is heat-up speed: the XMAX Ace is ready in ~20 seconds versus ~40 seconds on the DaVinci MIQRO, which changes whether it feels on-demand or scheduled.
XMAX Ace reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the DaVinci MIQRO takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the XMAX Ace, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
DaVinci MIQRO has the larger chamber at ~0.3g, versus 0.2-0.3g on the XMAX Ace. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $99 for the DaVinci MIQRO versus $110 for the XMAX Ace. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX Ace covers 100°C - 255°C, a wider band than the DaVinci MIQRO at 170°C - 230°C. A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
DaVinci MIQRO is the better fit for microdosing in our database, typically thanks to a smaller chamber, finer temperature control, or both.
Across the 16 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 14, an overlap of about 13%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.