Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeDaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $49 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
DaVinci MIQRO-C
XMAX V3 Nano
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DaVinci MIQRO-C and XMAX V3 Nano are both budget / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $49 below DaVinci MIQRO-C. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
27
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $49 lower.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
—
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Heating Type
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heat Up Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
DaVinci MIQRO-C
176°C - 221°C
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~0.25g
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Battery Type
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Removable 18350 battery
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
900mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charging
DaVinci MIQRO-C
USB-C
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Charge Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~90 minutes
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Pass-Through Charging
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Yes
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DaVinci MIQRO-C | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $99 | $50 |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 176°C - 221°C | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | — |
| Battery Type | Removable 18350 battery | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | ~50 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | — |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | — | 50g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular (4 stages) | — |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | — |
| Capacity | — | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Heating Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name | — | V3 Nano |
| Run Time | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Type | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 27 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX V3 Nano is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $99 for the DaVinci MIQRO-C, about $49 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Yes, only the DaVinci MIQRO-C supports pass-through charging. The XMAX V3 Nano has to finish charging before you can use it.
XMAX V3 Nano fully charges in ~50 minutes, ahead of ~90 minutes on the DaVinci MIQRO-C.
DaVinci MIQRO-C is the better fit for microdosing in our database, typically thanks to a smaller chamber, finer temperature control, or both.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.