Price (USD)
Close callXMAX Tunke
$50
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XMAX Tunke
XMAX $50
XMAX V3 Nano
XMAX $50
XMAX Tunke and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($50 vs $50). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
28
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
7
Overall Overlap
25%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX Tunke
$50
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
XMAX Tunke
Conduction
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Heating Type
XMAX Tunke
Conduction
XMAX V3 Nano
Hybrid (primarily convection)
Temperature Range
XMAX Tunke
260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F)
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Battery Type
XMAX Tunke
Internal
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
XMAX Tunke
650mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Power Adjustment
XMAX Tunke
Modular - 5 Stages
XMAX V3 Nano
None (fixed preset)
Chamber Material
XMAX Tunke
Quartz
XMAX V3 Nano
Stainless steel
Session Style
XMAX Tunke
Both
XMAX V3 Nano
Session
Warranty
XMAX Tunke
6 months
XMAX V3 Nano
1 year
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XMAX Tunke | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $50 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
| Heat Up Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F) | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity | — | ~0.1g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 650mAh | 1000mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | ~50 minutes |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | — | 50g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 5 Stages | None (fixed preset) |
| Chamber Material | Quartz | Stainless steel |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | XMAX | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | TopGreen Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
| Session Style | Both | Session |
| Session Time | 15 seconds | — |
| Session Timer | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Warranty | 6 months | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: XMAX Tunke runs conduction while XMAX V3 Nano runs hybrid (primarily convection). That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX Tunke uses conduction heating, while the XMAX V3 Nano uses hybrid (primarily convection). Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Listed prices are close: $50 for the XMAX Tunke versus $50 for the XMAX V3 Nano. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX Tunke covers 260°C - 380°C (500°F - 716°F), a wider band than the XMAX V3 Nano at 200 - 220C (single temp setting). A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
Yes, both are from XMAX, which usually means similar build quality, support, and accessory ecosystems.
Across the 28 specs we line up, they share 7 and differ on 21, an overlap of about 25%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.