Price (USD)
Close callDaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
DaVinci Tech $99
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
DaVinci MIQRO-C and XMAX QOMO are both budget / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($99 vs $89). XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
9%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heat Up Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
DaVinci MIQRO-C
176°C - 221°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~0.25g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Removable 18350 battery
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
900mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~30 minutes
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charge Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~90 minutes
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
DaVinci MIQRO-C
80x34x23mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Modular (4 stages)
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DaVinci MIQRO-C | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $99 | $89 |
| Device Type | — | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 176°C - 221°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Removable 18350 battery | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~30 minutes | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | 1-2 Hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 80x34x23mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 87g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular (4 stages) | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic (Glass-Lined) | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 5 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heat-up speed: the XMAX QOMO is ready in ~20 seconds versus ~40 seconds on the DaVinci MIQRO-C, which changes whether it feels on-demand or scheduled.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the DaVinci MIQRO-C takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
DaVinci MIQRO-C has the larger chamber at ~0.25g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $99 for the DaVinci MIQRO-C versus $89 for the XMAX QOMO. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
DaVinci MIQRO-C uses removable 18350 battery, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX QOMO has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
DaVinci MIQRO-C's spec sheet lists ~30 minutes; the XMAX QOMO lists 10-20 Sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
XMAX QOMO covers 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F), a wider band than the DaVinci MIQRO-C at 176°C - 221°C. A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.