Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO-C edgeDaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
PAX 2
$150
DaVinci MIQRO-C is typically around $51 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
DaVinci MIQRO-C vs PAX 2
DaVinci MIQRO-C
VS
PAX 2
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
DaVinci MIQRO-C and PAX 2 are both conduction / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. DaVinci MIQRO-C is usually the lower-cost pick at $99, around $51 below PAX 2. DaVinci MIQRO-C has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
16
Different Specs
15
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
6%
Shared Traits
Conduction Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C edgeDaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
PAX 2
<60 seconds
DaVinci MIQRO-C has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Weight
Close callDaVinci MIQRO-C
—
PAX 2
~90 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Heating Style
Close callDaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
PAX 2
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
vs
PAX 2
$150
Device Type
DaVinci MIQRO-C
—
vs
PAX 2
Portable
Heat Up Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
vs
PAX 2
<60 seconds
Temperature Range
DaVinci MIQRO-C
176°C - 221°C
vs
PAX 2
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~0.25g
vs
PAX 2
0.15 - 0.35 grams
Battery Type
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Removable 18350 battery
vs
PAX 2
—
Battery Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
900mAh
vs
PAX 2
3000mAh
Charging
DaVinci MIQRO-C
USB-C
vs
PAX 2
—
Charge Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~90 minutes
vs
PAX 2
—
Pass-Through Charging
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Yes
vs
PAX 2
—
Choose DaVinci MIQRO-C if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($99 vs $150).
- You care about faster heat-up time for quicker sessions.
- Your usage leans toward budget and battery swap sessions.
Choose PAX 2 if...
- Your usage leans toward portable and discrete sessions.
- You prefer PAX 2's overall feature mix and form factor.
- You prefer PAX 2's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
15 differ 1 shared
| Specification | DaVinci MIQRO-C | PAX 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $99 | $150 |
| Device Type | — | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | <60 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 176°C - 221°C | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | 0.15 - 0.35 grams |
| Battery Type | Removable 18350 battery | — |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | 3000mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | — |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth / App | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm |
| Weight | — | ~90 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Modular (4 stages) | — |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | PAX Labs |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the DaVinci MIQRO-C and the PAX 2?
The biggest practical difference is heat-up speed: the DaVinci MIQRO-C is ready in ~40 seconds versus <60 seconds on the PAX 2, which changes whether it feels on-demand or scheduled.
Which is cheaper, the DaVinci MIQRO-C or the PAX 2?
DaVinci MIQRO-C is the cheaper option at $99 compared with $150 for the PAX 2, about $51 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which heats up faster, the DaVinci MIQRO-C or the PAX 2?
DaVinci MIQRO-C reaches session-ready temperature in ~40 seconds, while the PAX 2 takes <60 seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the DaVinci MIQRO-C, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Can I use the DaVinci MIQRO-C while charging?
Yes, only the DaVinci MIQRO-C supports pass-through charging. The PAX 2 has to finish charging before you can use it.
Does the DaVinci MIQRO-C or the PAX 2 have a companion app?
Only the PAX 2 pairs with a companion app. The DaVinci MIQRO-C relies entirely on its on-device controls.
How much flower do the DaVinci MIQRO-C and PAX 2 hold?
DaVinci MIQRO-C lists a chamber capacity of ~0.25g; the PAX 2 lists 0.15 - 0.35 grams.
Which is more discreet, the DaVinci MIQRO-C or the PAX 2?
PAX 2 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the DaVinci MIQRO-C is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.