Price (USD)
XMAX Ace edgeDaVinci IQC
$199
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $89 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
DaVinci IQC
XMAX Ace
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DaVinci IQC and XMAX Ace are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Ace is usually the lower-cost pick at $110, around $89 below DaVinci IQC. XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DaVinci IQC
$199
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $89 lower.
DaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
DaVinci IQC
~160g
XMAX Ace
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
DaVinci IQC
Conduction
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci IQC
$199
XMAX Ace
$110
Heat Up Time
DaVinci IQC
~30 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
DaVinci IQC
Up to 221°C
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci IQC
~0.5g
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
DaVinci IQC
Removable 18650 battery
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
DaVinci IQC
—
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Battery Life
DaVinci IQC
~1 hour
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
DaVinci IQC
USB-C
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Charge Time
DaVinci IQC
~2 hours
XMAX Ace
—
Pass-Through Charging
DaVinci IQC
No
XMAX Ace
—
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DaVinci IQC | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $199 | $110 |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | Up to 221°C | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.5g | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Removable 18650 battery | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~1 hour | <10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~2 hours | — |
| Pass-Through Charging | No | — |
| Dimensions | 92x45x25mm | — |
| Weight | ~160g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | — |
| Oven Type | Ceramic | — |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | — |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Heating Time | ~60 seconds | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 20 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX Ace is the cheaper option at $110 compared with $199 for the DaVinci IQC, about $89 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX Ace reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the DaVinci IQC takes ~30 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the XMAX Ace, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
DaVinci IQC has the larger chamber at ~0.5g, versus 0.2-0.3g on the XMAX Ace. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
DaVinci IQC's spec sheet lists ~1 hour; the XMAX Ace lists <10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
DaVinci IQC charges over USB-C; the XMAX Ace uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.