Price (USD)
XMAX Ace edgeCAT
$199
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $89 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
CAT
End Game Labs $199
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
CAT and XMAX Ace are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Ace is usually the lower-cost pick at $110, around $89 below CAT. XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
13%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
CAT
$199
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $89 lower.
CAT
~30 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
CAT
Convection
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
CAT
$199
XMAX Ace
$110
Heating Type
CAT
Convection
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heat Up Time
CAT
~30 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
CAT
Up to 230°C
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Battery Type
CAT
Swappable 21700
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
CAT
4000mAh
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Battery Life
CAT
~50 minutes
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
CAT
USB-C
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
CAT
Digital Control
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
Brand
CAT
End Game Labs
XMAX Ace
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | CAT | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $199 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~30 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | Up to 230°C | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | — | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Swappable 21700 | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 4000mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~50 minutes | <10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~2.5 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 104x60x33mm | — |
| Weight | 200g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | — | Ceramic |
| Brand | End Game Labs | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | Yes |
| Joint Size | 14mm / 18mm | — |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | Both | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: CAT runs convection while XMAX Ace runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX Ace is the cheaper option at $110 compared with $199 for the CAT, about $89 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX Ace reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the CAT takes ~30 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the XMAX Ace, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
CAT uses convection heating, while the XMAX Ace uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
CAT's spec sheet lists ~50 minutes; the XMAX Ace lists <10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
CAT charges over USB-C; the XMAX Ace uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Across the 24 specs we line up, they share 3 and differ on 21, an overlap of about 13%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.