Skip to content

Vaporizer Comparison

AUXO Celsius vs DaVinci MIQRO-C

Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.

AUXO Celsius

AUXO Celsius

AUXO $250

VS
DaVinci MIQRO-C

DaVinci MIQRO-C

DaVinci Tech $99

Editorial Summary

AUXO Celsius and DaVinci MIQRO-C are both conduction / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. DaVinci MIQRO-C is usually the lower-cost pick at $99, around $151 below AUXO Celsius. AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.

Specs Compared

27

Different Specs

25

Shared Specs

2

Overall Overlap

7%

Shared Traits

Conduction Electronic

Head-to-Head Highlights

A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.

Price (USD)

DaVinci MIQRO-C edge

AUXO Celsius

$250

DaVinci MIQRO-C

$99

DaVinci MIQRO-C is typically around $151 lower.

Heat-Up Time

AUXO Celsius edge

AUXO Celsius

6-30 seconds

DaVinci MIQRO-C

~40 seconds

AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile.

Weight

DaVinci MIQRO-C edge

AUXO Celsius

157.8g

DaVinci MIQRO-C

87g

DaVinci MIQRO-C is the lighter listed unit.

Heating Style

Close call

AUXO Celsius

Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)

DaVinci MIQRO-C

Conduction

Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.

Key Differences at a Glance

Top specs where these two devices diverge.

10 differences

Price (USD)

AUXO Celsius

$250

DaVinci MIQRO-C

$99

Heating Type

AUXO Celsius

Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)

DaVinci MIQRO-C

Conduction

Heat Up Time

AUXO Celsius

6-30 seconds

DaVinci MIQRO-C

~40 seconds

Temperature Range

AUXO Celsius

284°F - 500°F (140°C - 260°C)

DaVinci MIQRO-C

176°C - 221°C

Chamber Capacity

AUXO Celsius

0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates

DaVinci MIQRO-C

~0.25g

Battery Type

AUXO Celsius

Lithium-ion

DaVinci MIQRO-C

Removable 18350 battery

Battery Capacity

AUXO Celsius

1000mAh

DaVinci MIQRO-C

900mAh

Battery Life

AUXO Celsius

~9 sessions

DaVinci MIQRO-C

~30 minutes

Charge Time

AUXO Celsius

1.5 hours

DaVinci MIQRO-C

~90 minutes

Dimensions

AUXO Celsius

114.1x45.1x33.3mm

DaVinci MIQRO-C

80x34x23mm

Choose AUXO Celsius if...

  • You care about faster heat-up time for quicker sessions.
  • You prefer a hybrid (primarily conduction) heating profile.
  • Your usage leans toward portable and hybrid sessions.
View AUXO Celsius Profile

Choose DaVinci MIQRO-C if...

  • You want the lower listed entry price ($99 vs $250).
  • You want the lighter unit for carrying and travel.
  • You prefer a conduction heating profile.
  • Your usage leans toward budget and battery swap sessions.
View DaVinci MIQRO-C Profile

Spec Comparison Table

Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.

25 differ 2 shared
SpecificationAUXO CelsiusDaVinci MIQRO-C
Price (USD) $250$99
Device Type Portable
Heating Type Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)Conduction
Heat Up Time 6-30 seconds~40 seconds
Temperature Range 284°F - 500°F (140°C - 260°C)176°C - 221°C
Chamber Capacity 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates~0.25g
Battery Type Lithium-ionRemovable 18350 battery
Battery Capacity 1000mAh900mAh
Battery Life ~9 sessions~30 minutes
Charging USB-CUSB-C
Charge Time 1.5 hours~90 minutes
Pass-Through Charging Yes
Bluetooth / App Yes
Dimensions 114.1x45.1x33.3mm80x34x23mm
Weight 157.8g87g
Power Adjustment Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode)Modular (4 stages)
Chamber Material QuartzCeramic (Glass-Lined)
Concentrate Support Yes
Brand AUXODaVinci Tech
Adjustable Airflow No
Body Material Aluminum Alloy
Country of Manufacture China
Haptic Feedback Yes
Mouthpiece Material Zirconia
Release Date 20232023
Session Style Session
Warranty 2 years5 years

Comparison FAQs

What is the biggest difference between the AUXO Celsius and the DaVinci MIQRO-C?

The biggest practical difference is price tier: the DaVinci MIQRO-C sits at $99 while the AUXO Celsius is $250, a gap of about $151 that puts them in different buying brackets.

Which is cheaper, the AUXO Celsius or the DaVinci MIQRO-C?

DaVinci MIQRO-C is the cheaper option at $99 compared with $250 for the AUXO Celsius, about $151 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.

Which heats up faster, the AUXO Celsius or the DaVinci MIQRO-C?

AUXO Celsius reaches session-ready temperature in 6-30 seconds, while the DaVinci MIQRO-C takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 22 seconds quicker on the AUXO Celsius, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.

What's the difference in heating between the AUXO Celsius and the DaVinci MIQRO-C?

AUXO Celsius uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the DaVinci MIQRO-C uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.

Does the AUXO Celsius or the DaVinci MIQRO-C hold more flower?

DaVinci MIQRO-C has the larger chamber at ~0.25g, versus 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates on the AUXO Celsius. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.

Which is lighter, the AUXO Celsius or the DaVinci MIQRO-C?

DaVinci MIQRO-C is the lighter unit at 87g, around 71g less than the AUXO Celsius at 157.8g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.

Can I swap the batteries on the AUXO Celsius or the DaVinci MIQRO-C?

DaVinci MIQRO-C uses removable 18350 battery, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The AUXO Celsius has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.

Need a different matchup?

Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.