Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO-C edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
DaVinci MIQRO-C is typically around $151 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Celsius vs DaVinci MIQRO-C
AUXO Celsius
VS
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
AUXO Celsius and DaVinci MIQRO-C are both conduction / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. DaVinci MIQRO-C is usually the lower-cost pick at $99, around $151 below AUXO Celsius. AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
Conduction Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
AUXO Celsius edgeAUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Heating Style
Close callAUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
vs
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
vs
DaVinci MIQRO-C
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
vs
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
vs
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
DaVinci MIQRO-C
176°C - 221°C
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~0.25g
Battery Type
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Removable 18350 battery
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
vs
DaVinci MIQRO-C
900mAh
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
vs
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~90 minutes
Pass-Through Charging
AUXO Celsius
—
vs
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Yes
Choose AUXO Celsius if...
- You care about faster heat-up time for quicker sessions.
- You prefer a hybrid (primarily conduction) heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and hybrid sessions.
Choose DaVinci MIQRO-C if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($99 vs $250).
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward budget and battery swap sessions.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
20 differ 1 shared
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | DaVinci MIQRO-C |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $99 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | ~40 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 176°C - 221°C |
| Chamber Capacity | — | ~0.25g |
| Battery Type | — | Removable 18350 battery |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 900mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | ~90 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Modular (4 stages) |
| Oven Type | Quarts | — |
| Brand | AUXO | DaVinci Tech |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the AUXO Celsius and the DaVinci MIQRO-C?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the DaVinci MIQRO-C sits at $99 while the AUXO Celsius is $250, a gap of about $151 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the AUXO Celsius or the DaVinci MIQRO-C?
DaVinci MIQRO-C is the cheaper option at $99 compared with $250 for the AUXO Celsius, about $151 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Which heats up faster, the AUXO Celsius or the DaVinci MIQRO-C?
AUXO Celsius reaches session-ready temperature in 6-30 seconds, while the DaVinci MIQRO-C takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 22 seconds quicker on the AUXO Celsius, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
What's the difference in heating between the AUXO Celsius and the DaVinci MIQRO-C?
AUXO Celsius uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the DaVinci MIQRO-C uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Can I use the DaVinci MIQRO-C while charging?
Yes, only the DaVinci MIQRO-C supports pass-through charging. The AUXO Celsius has to finish charging before you can use it.
Can I use concentrates with the AUXO Celsius or the DaVinci MIQRO-C?
Only the AUXO Celsius supports concentrates out of the box. The DaVinci MIQRO-C is dry-herb-only by design.
Can I set custom temperatures on the AUXO Celsius or the DaVinci MIQRO-C?
AUXO Celsius controls heat with modular - 4 stages (and an app controlled custom mode), while the DaVinci MIQRO-C uses modular (4 stages). AUXO Celsius gives you finer per-degree control.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.