Price (USD)
Atmos Jump edgeAtmos Jump
$65
XMAX Ace
$110
Atmos Jump is typically around $45 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Atmos Jump
AtmosRx $65
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
Atmos Jump and XMAX Ace are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Atmos Jump is usually the lower-cost pick at $65, around $45 below XMAX Ace. XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
18%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX Ace
$110
Atmos Jump is typically around $45 lower.
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Atmos Jump
$65
XMAX Ace
$110
Heating Type
Atmos Jump
Convection
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Atmos Jump
~60 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Atmos Jump
392°F (fixed)
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
Atmos Jump
~0.2g
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
Atmos Jump
Lithium-ion
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
Atmos Jump
1200mAh
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Battery Life
Atmos Jump
~30-40 minutes
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Power Adjustment
Atmos Jump
Modular
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Atmos Jump
Stainless Steel
XMAX Ace
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Atmos Jump | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $65 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~60 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 392°F (fixed) | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.2g | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 1200mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~30-40 minutes | <10 sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 145x17mm | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Brand | AtmosRx | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Atmos Jump runs convection while XMAX Ace runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Atmos Jump is the cheaper option at $65 compared with $110 for the XMAX Ace, about $45 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX Ace reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the Atmos Jump takes ~60 seconds. That's roughly 40 seconds quicker on the XMAX Ace, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Atmos Jump uses convection heating, while the XMAX Ace uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX Ace has the larger chamber at 0.2-0.3g, versus ~0.2g on the Atmos Jump. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
XMAX Ace uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Atmos Jump has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Atmos Jump controls heat with modular, while the XMAX Ace uses digital (precise). XMAX Ace gives you finer per-degree control.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.