Price (USD)
Close callArizer Solo 2
$120
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Solo 2
Arizer $120
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
Arizer Solo 2 and XMAX Ace are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($120 vs $110). Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
17%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Solo 2
$120
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Arizer Solo 2
~20 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Arizer Solo 2
Hybrid
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Solo 2
$120
XMAX Ace
$110
Heating Type
Arizer Solo 2
Hybrid
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Temperature Range
Arizer Solo 2
50°C-220°C
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Solo 2
~0.3g
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
Arizer Solo 2
Internal
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Life
Arizer Solo 2
~3 hours
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
Arizer Solo 2
Proprietary DC Adapter
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
Arizer Solo 2
Digital
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Arizer Solo 2
Glass
XMAX Ace
Ceramic
Brand
Arizer Solo 2
Arizer
XMAX Ace
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Solo 2 | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $120 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 50°C-220°C | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.3g | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Internal | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | ~3 hours | <10 sessions |
| Charging | Proprietary DC Adapter | Micro USB |
| Dimensions | 114x45x35mm | — |
| Weight | ~210g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Ceramic |
| Brand | Arizer | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2017 | — |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | Session | Session |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Arizer Solo 2 runs hybrid while XMAX Ace runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
Arizer Solo 2 uses hybrid heating, while the XMAX Ace uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Arizer Solo 2 has the larger chamber at ~0.3g, versus 0.2-0.3g on the XMAX Ace. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $120 for the Arizer Solo 2 versus $110 for the XMAX Ace. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX Ace uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Arizer Solo 2 has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Heat-up times are very close: ~20 seconds on the Arizer Solo 2 and ~20 seconds on the XMAX Ace. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
Arizer Solo 2's spec sheet lists ~3 hours; the XMAX Ace lists <10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.