Price (USD)
XMAX Ace edgeAirVape Enso
$420
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $310 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AirVape Enso
Apollo AirVape $420
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
AirVape Enso and XMAX Ace are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Ace is usually the lower-cost pick at $110, around $310 below AirVape Enso. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
28
Different Specs
26
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
7%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $310 lower.
AirVape Enso
Conduction
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AirVape Enso
$420
XMAX Ace
$110
Device Type
AirVape Enso
Portable Desktop
XMAX Ace
Portable
Temperature Range
AirVape Enso
180°C-330°C
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
AirVape Enso
3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup)
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
AirVape Enso
Removable Proprietary Battery
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
AirVape Enso
5000mAh
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Battery Life
AirVape Enso
2 hours
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
AirVape Enso
USB-C
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
AirVape Enso
Single Knob
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
Brand
AirVape Enso
Apollo AirVape
XMAX Ace
XMAX
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AirVape Enso | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $420 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable Desktop | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 180°C-330°C | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup) | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Removable Proprietary Battery | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 5000mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | 2 hours | <10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 3.5 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 33x12cm | — |
| Weight | 2.55 kg | — |
| Power Adjustment | Single Knob | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | Apollo AirVape | XMAX |
| Body Material | Zinc Alloy | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material | Stainless Steel | — |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | Lifetime | 1 year |
| Water Capacity | 200mL | — |
| Water Filtration | Yes | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Ace sits at $110 while the AirVape Enso is $420, a gap of about $310 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Ace is the cheaper option at $110 compared with $420 for the AirVape Enso, about $310 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
AirVape Enso has the larger chamber at 3g (Ceramic Cup) / 1.5g (Optional Metal Herb Cup), versus 0.2-0.3g on the XMAX Ace. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
AirVape Enso is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the XMAX Ace is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
AirVape Enso controls heat with single knob, while the XMAX Ace uses digital (precise). XMAX Ace gives you finer per-degree control.
AirVape Enso's spec sheet lists 2 hours; the XMAX Ace lists <10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
AirVape Enso charges over USB-C; the XMAX Ace uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.