Price (USD)
XMAX Ace edgeTempest
$247
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $137 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Tempest
Mad Heaters $247
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
Tempest and XMAX Ace are both portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Ace is usually the lower-cost pick at $110, around $137 below Tempest. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
23
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Tempest
$247
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $137 lower.
Tempest
Convection-heavy with some conduction
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Tempest
$247
XMAX Ace
$110
Heating Type
Tempest
Convection-heavy with some conduction
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Temperature Range
Tempest
N/A
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
Tempest
0.075g - 0.15g
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
Tempest
None
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
Tempest
N/A
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Battery Life
Tempest
N/A
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
Tempest
N/A
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
Tempest
Manual
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Tempest
Titanium
XMAX Ace
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Tempest | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $247 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection-heavy with some conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | N/A | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.075g - 0.15g | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | None | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | N/A | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | N/A | <10 sessions |
| Charging | N/A | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | N/A | — |
| Power Adjustment | Manual | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Titanium | Ceramic |
| Brand | Mad Heaters | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | Yes | — |
| Ball Size | 2.5mm Zirconia | — |
| Country of Manufacture | Made in China, Assembled in the UK | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | — | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Ace sits at $110 while the Tempest is $247, a gap of about $137 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Ace is the cheaper option at $110 compared with $247 for the Tempest, about $137 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Tempest uses convection-heavy with some conduction heating, while the XMAX Ace uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX Ace has the larger chamber at 0.2-0.3g, versus 0.075g - 0.15g on the Tempest. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
XMAX Ace uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Tempest has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Tempest controls heat with manual, while the XMAX Ace uses digital (precise). XMAX Ace gives you finer per-degree control.
Tempest's spec sheet lists N/A; the XMAX Ace lists <10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.