Price (USD)
XMAX Ace edgePOTV Lobo
$160
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $50 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
POTV Lobo and XMAX Ace are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Ace is usually the lower-cost pick at $110, around $50 below POTV Lobo. XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
POTV Lobo
$160
XMAX Ace
$110
XMAX Ace is typically around $50 lower.
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
POTV Lobo
150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem
XMAX Ace
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
POTV Lobo
$160
XMAX Ace
$110
Device Type
POTV Lobo
Portable
XMAX Ace
—
Heating Type
POTV Lobo
Dynamic Hybrid
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heat Up Time
POTV Lobo
~40 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
POTV Lobo
160-221°C (320-430°F)
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
POTV Lobo
—
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
POTV Lobo
Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650)
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Capacity
POTV Lobo
—
XMAX Ace
2600mAh
Battery Life
POTV Lobo
—
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
POTV Lobo
USB-C
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (21 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | POTV Lobo | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $160 | $110 |
| Device Type diff | Portable | — |
| Heating Type diff | Dynamic Hybrid | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time diff | ~40 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | 160-221°C (320-430°F) | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity diff | — | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type diff | Samsung 35E 3500mAh 8A (replaceable flat-top 18650) | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity diff | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life diff | — | <10 sessions |
| Charging diff | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Dimensions diff | 8.89cm H without stem, 10.16cm H with dimpled stem, 5.4cm W, 2.85cm D | — |
| Weight diff | 150g without stem, 156g with dimpled stem | — |
| Power Adjustment diff | Digital (LCD) | — |
| Brand diff | Planet of the Vapes | — |
| Battery Runtime diff | Up to ~10 sessions per charge | — |
| Concentrates diff | Supported with included concentrate pad in the dosing capsule (use very small amounts) | — |
| Display Type diff | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback diff | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Replaceable Battery diff | — | Yes |
| Warranty diff | 2 years through POTV | — |
Neither is universally better. POTV Lobo fits some priorities, while XMAX Ace fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX Ace is listed lower ($110) compared with POTV Lobo ($160), but live retailer pricing can change.
XMAX Ace has the faster listed heat-up time (~20 seconds) versus POTV Lobo (~40 seconds).
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.