Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO-C edgeDaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
Linx Apollo
$260
DaVinci MIQRO-C is typically around $161 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
DaVinci MIQRO-C vs Linx Apollo
DaVinci MIQRO-C
VS
Linx Apollo
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Editorial Summary
DaVinci MIQRO-C and Linx Apollo are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. DaVinci MIQRO-C is usually the lower-cost pick at $99, around $161 below Linx Apollo. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
14
Different Specs
13
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
7%
Shared Traits
Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heat-Up Time
Close callDaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
Linx Apollo
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
Weight
Close callDaVinci MIQRO-C
—
Linx Apollo
150 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Heating Style
Close callDaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
Linx Apollo
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
vs
Linx Apollo
$260
Heating Type
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Heat Up Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Temperature Range
DaVinci MIQRO-C
176°C - 221°C
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~0.25g
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Battery Type
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Removable 18350 battery
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Battery Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
900mAh
vs
Linx Apollo
2600mAh
Charging
DaVinci MIQRO-C
USB-C
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Charge Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~90 minutes
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Pass-Through Charging
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Yes
vs
Linx Apollo
—
Choose DaVinci MIQRO-C if...
- You want the lower listed entry price ($99 vs $260).
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward budget and conduction sessions.
Choose Linx Apollo if...
- You prefer a — heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and concentrates sessions.
- You prefer Linx Apollo's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
13 differ 1 shared
| Specification | DaVinci MIQRO-C | Linx Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $99 | $260 |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 176°C - 221°C | — |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | — |
| Battery Type | Removable 18350 battery | — |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | 2600mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | — |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | — | 60 x 40 x 40mm |
| Weight | — | 150 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Modular (4 stages) | Modular - 4 Stages |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | Linx Vapor |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the DaVinci MIQRO-C and the Linx Apollo?
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the DaVinci MIQRO-C sits at $99 while the Linx Apollo is $260, a gap of about $161 that puts them in different buying brackets.
Which is cheaper, the DaVinci MIQRO-C or the Linx Apollo?
DaVinci MIQRO-C is the cheaper option at $99 compared with $260 for the Linx Apollo, about $161 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Can I use the DaVinci MIQRO-C while charging?
Yes, only the DaVinci MIQRO-C supports pass-through charging. The Linx Apollo has to finish charging before you can use it.
Is the DaVinci MIQRO-C or the Linx Apollo better for microdosing?
DaVinci MIQRO-C is the better fit for microdosing in our database, typically thanks to a smaller chamber, finer temperature control, or both.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.