Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO-C edgeDaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
Frolic Thermal Extractor
$399
DaVinci MIQRO-C is typically around $300 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
DaVinci Tech $99
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Limelight $399
DaVinci MIQRO-C and Frolic Thermal Extractor are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. DaVinci MIQRO-C is usually the lower-cost pick at $99, around $300 below Frolic Thermal Extractor. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
21
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
10%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
Frolic Thermal Extractor
$399
DaVinci MIQRO-C is typically around $300 lower.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Variable
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
87g
Frolic Thermal Extractor
245g
DaVinci MIQRO-C is the lighter listed unit.
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Convection
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO-C
$99
Frolic Thermal Extractor
$399
Heating Type
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Conduction
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Convection
Heat Up Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~40 seconds
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Variable
Temperature Range
DaVinci MIQRO-C
176°C - 221°C
Frolic Thermal Extractor
40°C - 240°C
Battery Type
DaVinci MIQRO-C
Removable 18350 battery
Frolic Thermal Extractor
Removable 21700
Battery Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO-C
900mAh
Frolic Thermal Extractor
5000mAh
Battery Life
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~30 minutes
Frolic Thermal Extractor
~13 sessions
Charge Time
DaVinci MIQRO-C
~90 minutes
Frolic Thermal Extractor
~1 hour 40 minutes
Dimensions
DaVinci MIQRO-C
80x34x23mm
Frolic Thermal Extractor
105x63x24mm
Weight
DaVinci MIQRO-C
87g
Frolic Thermal Extractor
245g
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DaVinci MIQRO-C | Frolic Thermal Extractor |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $99 | $399 |
| Device Type | — | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Convection |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | Variable |
| Temperature Range | 176°C - 221°C | 40°C - 240°C |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.25g | ~0.25g |
| Battery Type | Removable 18350 battery | Removable 21700 |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | 5000mAh |
| Battery Life | ~30 minutes | ~13 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | ~1 hour 40 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 80x34x23mm | 105x63x24mm |
| Weight | 87g | 245g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular (4 stages) | Digital |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic (Glass-Lined) | Anodized Aluminum |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | Limelight |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | Yes |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
| Session Style | — | Both |
| Warranty | 5 years | 2 years |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the DaVinci MIQRO-C sits at $99 while the Frolic Thermal Extractor is $399, a gap of about $300 that puts them in different buying brackets.
DaVinci MIQRO-C is the cheaper option at $99 compared with $399 for the Frolic Thermal Extractor, about $300 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
DaVinci MIQRO-C uses conduction heating, while the Frolic Thermal Extractor uses convection. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
DaVinci MIQRO-C is the lighter unit at 87g, around 158g less than the Frolic Thermal Extractor at 245g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
DaVinci MIQRO-C controls heat with modular (4 stages), while the Frolic Thermal Extractor uses digital. Frolic Thermal Extractor gives you finer per-degree control.
Frolic Thermal Extractor fully charges in ~1 hour 40 minutes, ahead of ~90 minutes on the DaVinci MIQRO-C.
DaVinci MIQRO-C's spec sheet lists ~30 minutes; the Frolic Thermal Extractor lists ~13 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.