Price (USD)
XVape V-ONE 2.0 edgeArizer Solo
$114
XVape V-ONE 2.0
$89
XVape V-ONE 2.0 is typically around $25 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Solo
Arizer $114
XVape V-ONE 2.0
XVape $89
Arizer Solo and XVape V-ONE 2.0 are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XVape V-ONE 2.0 is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $25 below Arizer Solo. XVape V-ONE 2.0 has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
12%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Solo
$114
XVape V-ONE 2.0
$89
XVape V-ONE 2.0 is typically around $25 lower.
Arizer Solo
~90 seconds
XVape V-ONE 2.0
~2 seconds
XVape V-ONE 2.0 has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Arizer Solo
Hybrid
XVape V-ONE 2.0
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Solo
$114
XVape V-ONE 2.0
$89
Heating Type
Arizer Solo
Hybrid
XVape V-ONE 2.0
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Arizer Solo
~90 seconds
XVape V-ONE 2.0
~2 seconds
Temperature Range
Arizer Solo
185°C-210°C
XVape V-ONE 2.0
350°C - 360°C (662°F - 680°F)
Charging
Arizer Solo
Proprietary Barrel Charger
XVape V-ONE 2.0
Micro USB
Dimensions
Arizer Solo
45x114mm
XVape V-ONE 2.0
120 x 19mm (110mm tall with the steel mouthpiece)
Power Adjustment
Arizer Solo
Modular - 7 stages
XVape V-ONE 2.0
Preset - 2 Stages (low and high)
Chamber Material
Arizer Solo
Glass
XVape V-ONE 2.0
Ceramic heating dish with dual quartz coil
Brand
Arizer Solo
Arizer
XVape V-ONE 2.0
XVape
Release Date
Arizer Solo
2011
XVape V-ONE 2.0
2019
Typical price
$89
Sold by Daily High Club
Prices are read automatically from retailer pages; confirm the price at checkout. Some links are affiliate links, which support Thermal Extractions at no extra cost to you.
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Solo | XVape V-ONE 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $114 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~90 seconds | ~2 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 185°C-210°C | 350°C - 360°C (662°F - 680°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.15g | — |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | — | 1500mAh |
| Battery Life | 1-2 hours | — |
| Charging | Proprietary Barrel Charger | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 45x114mm | 120 x 19mm (110mm tall with the steel mouthpiece) |
| Weight | ~217g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 7 stages | Preset - 2 Stages (low and high) |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Ceramic heating dish with dual quartz coil |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | Arizer | XVape |
| Battery Power | — | 20W |
| Coil Size | — | 0.5ohm dual quartz |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2019 |
| Session Style | — | On-Demand |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
| Water Filtration | — | Glass bubbler mouthpiece included |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Arizer Solo runs hybrid while XVape V-ONE 2.0 runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XVape V-ONE 2.0 is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $114 for the Arizer Solo, about $25 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XVape V-ONE 2.0 reaches session-ready temperature in ~2 seconds, while the Arizer Solo takes ~90 seconds. That's roughly 88 seconds quicker on the XVape V-ONE 2.0, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Arizer Solo uses hybrid heating, while the XVape V-ONE 2.0 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XVape V-ONE 2.0 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Arizer Solo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Across the 25 specs we line up, they share 3 and differ on 22, an overlap of about 12%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.