Price (USD)
Close callArizer Solo
$114
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
Arizer Solo
Arizer $114
XMAX Ace
XMAX $110
Arizer Solo and XMAX Ace are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($114 vs $110). XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
24
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
8%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Arizer Solo
$114
XMAX Ace
$110
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Arizer Solo
~90 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
XMAX Ace has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
Arizer Solo
Hybrid
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
Arizer Solo
$114
XMAX Ace
$110
Heating Type
Arizer Solo
Hybrid
XMAX Ace
Conduction
Heat Up Time
Arizer Solo
~90 seconds
XMAX Ace
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
Arizer Solo
185°C-210°C
XMAX Ace
100°C - 255°C
Chamber Capacity
Arizer Solo
~0.15g
XMAX Ace
0.2-0.3g
Battery Type
Arizer Solo
Internal
XMAX Ace
18650
Battery Life
Arizer Solo
1-2 hours
XMAX Ace
<10 sessions
Charging
Arizer Solo
Proprietary Barrel Charger
XMAX Ace
Micro USB
Power Adjustment
Arizer Solo
Modular - 7 stages
XMAX Ace
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
Arizer Solo
Glass
XMAX Ace
Ceramic
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | Arizer Solo | XMAX Ace |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $114 | $110 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Hybrid | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~90 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 185°C-210°C | 100°C - 255°C |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.15g | 0.2-0.3g |
| Battery Type | Internal | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | — | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | 1-2 hours | <10 sessions |
| Charging | Proprietary Barrel Charger | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~4 hours | — |
| Dimensions | 45x114mm | — |
| Weight | ~180g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 7 stages | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Ceramic |
| Brand | Arizer | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2011 | — |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: Arizer Solo runs hybrid while XMAX Ace runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX Ace reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the Arizer Solo takes ~90 seconds. That's roughly 70 seconds quicker on the XMAX Ace, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
Arizer Solo uses hybrid heating, while the XMAX Ace uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XMAX Ace has the larger chamber at 0.2-0.3g, versus ~0.15g on the Arizer Solo. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $114 for the Arizer Solo versus $110 for the XMAX Ace. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX Ace uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The Arizer Solo has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Arizer Solo controls heat with modular - 7 stages, while the XMAX Ace uses digital (precise). XMAX Ace gives you finer per-degree control.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.