Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgePAX Plus
$125
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $36 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
PAX Plus
PAX Labs $125
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
PAX Plus and XMAX QOMO are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $36 below PAX Plus. XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
9%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
PAX Plus
$125
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $36 lower.
PAX Plus
<30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
PAX Plus
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
PAX Plus
$125
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heat Up Time
PAX Plus
<30 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
PAX Plus
360°F - 420°F
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
PAX Plus
0.25g - 0.5g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
PAX Plus
Internal 18650
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
PAX Plus
3300mAh (internal)
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
PAX Plus
2+ hours
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
PAX Plus
Magnetic dock via USB, under ~120 minutes
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
PAX Plus
2-3 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
PAX Plus
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | PAX Plus | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $125 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | <30 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 360°F - 420°F | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.25g - 0.5g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal 18650 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 3300mAh (internal) | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | 2+ hours | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Magnetic dock via USB, under ~120 minutes | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 2-3 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 91 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Stealth, Efficiency, Flavor, Boost modes | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Supports concentrate insert (Complete Kit) | Yes |
| Brand | PAX Labs | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
| Session Style | Session | — |
| Warranty | 10 years | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 20 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $125 for the PAX Plus, about $36 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the PAX Plus takes <30 seconds. That's roughly 10 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
PAX Plus has the larger chamber at 0.25g - 0.5g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
PAX Plus controls heat with stealth, efficiency, flavor, boost modes, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. Both let you change temperature, just with different levels of precision.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of 2-3 hours on the PAX Plus.
PAX Plus is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX QOMO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.