Price (USD)
Close callPAX 3
$250
Ruby Wireless
$255
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
PAX 3 vs Ruby Wireless
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
PAX 3
PAX Labs $250
VS
Ruby Wireless
SZ Crossing $254.99
Editorial Summary
PAX 3 and Ruby Wireless are both electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($250 vs $255). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Electronic
Head-to-Head Highlights
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
Heating Style
Close callPAX 3
Conduction
Ruby Wireless
Convection
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Key Differences at a Glance
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
PAX 3
$250
Ruby Wireless
$255
Device Type
PAX 3
Portable
Ruby Wireless
Desktop
Heating Type
PAX 3
Conduction
Ruby Wireless
Convection
Temperature Range
PAX 3
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Ruby Wireless
510F - 560F (Suggested)
Chamber Capacity
PAX 3
<0.35 grams
Ruby Wireless
Not specified
Battery Type
PAX 3
Internal 18650
Ruby Wireless
N/A
Charging
PAX 3
Proprietary Dock
Ruby Wireless
N/A
Power Adjustment
PAX 3
Modular - 4 stages
Ruby Wireless
Digital (precise)
Chamber Material
PAX 3
Stainless Steel
Ruby Wireless
Titanium
Brand
PAX 3
PAX Labs
Ruby Wireless
SZ Crossing
Choose PAX 3 if...
- You prefer a conduction heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward portable and conduction sessions.
- You prefer PAX 3's overall feature mix and form factor.
Choose Ruby Wireless if...
- You prefer a convection heating profile.
- Your usage leans toward desktop and convection sessions.
- You prefer Ruby Wireless's overall feature mix and form factor.
Spec Comparison Table
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
25 differ 0 shared
| Specification | PAX 3 | Ruby Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $255 |
| Device Type | Portable | Desktop |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Convection |
| Heat Up Time | <30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) | 510F - 560F (Suggested) |
| Chamber Capacity | <0.35 grams | Not specified |
| Battery Type | Internal 18650 | N/A |
| Battery Capacity | 3500mAh | — |
| Battery Life | ~90 minutes | — |
| Charging | Proprietary Dock | N/A |
| Charge Time | ~90 minutes | — |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm | — |
| Weight | ~93 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 stages | Digital (precise) |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Titanium |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | PAX Labs | SZ Crossing |
| Ball Type | — | 520 gem-cut rubies |
| Body Material | — | Not specified |
| Coil Size | — | 25mm coaxial |
| Joint Size | — | 14.4mm and 18.8mm male |
| Power | — | Classic PID controller with dock |
| Release Date | 2016 | — |
| Warranty | 10 years | — |
Comparison FAQs
What is the biggest difference between the PAX 3 and the Ruby Wireless?
The biggest practical difference is form factor: these aren't the same kind of device. PAX 3 is a portable, Ruby Wireless is a desktop. Pick based on whether you want something portable or something stationary.
What's the difference in heating between the PAX 3 and the Ruby Wireless?
PAX 3 uses conduction heating, while the Ruby Wireless uses convection. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Is the PAX 3 or the Ruby Wireless better for home versus on-the-go use?
PAX 3 is the take-anywhere choice. It's a portable, battery-powered unit, while the Ruby Wireless is built for home use, where bigger heaters, AC power, and larger chambers make sense.
Which is cheaper, the PAX 3 or the Ruby Wireless?
Listed prices are close: $250 for the PAX 3 versus $255 for the Ruby Wireless. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
Can I set custom temperatures on the PAX 3 or the Ruby Wireless?
PAX 3 controls heat with modular - 4 stages, while the Ruby Wireless uses digital (precise). Ruby Wireless gives you finer per-degree control.
How much flower do the PAX 3 and Ruby Wireless hold?
PAX 3 lists a chamber capacity of <0.35 grams; the Ruby Wireless lists Not specified.
Which is more discreet, the PAX 3 or the Ruby Wireless?
PAX 3 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the Ruby Wireless is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Need a different matchup?
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.