Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgePAX 2
$150
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $100 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
PAX 2
XMAX V3 Nano
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
PAX 2 and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $100 below PAX 2. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
27
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
PAX 2
$150
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $100 lower.
PAX 2
<60 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
PAX 2
~90 grams
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter listed unit.
PAX 2
Conduction
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
PAX 2
$150
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Device Type
PAX 2
Portable
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating Type
PAX 2
Conduction
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heat Up Time
PAX 2
<60 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
PAX 2
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Chamber Capacity
PAX 2
0.15 - 0.35 grams
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Battery Type
PAX 2
—
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
PAX 2
3000mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charge Time
PAX 2
—
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Bluetooth / App
PAX 2
Yes
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | PAX 2 | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $150 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time | <60 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.15 - 0.35 grams | — |
| Battery Type | — | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 3000mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charge Time | — | ~50 minutes |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm | — |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | ~90 grams | 50g |
| Brand | PAX Labs | — |
| Capacity | — | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Heating Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name | — | V3 Nano |
| Run Time | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Type | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX V3 Nano sits at $50 while the PAX 2 is $150, a gap of about $100 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX V3 Nano is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $150 for the PAX 2, about $100 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter unit at 50g, around 40g less than the PAX 2 at ~90 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Only the PAX 2 pairs with a companion app. The XMAX V3 Nano relies entirely on its on-device controls.
PAX 2 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX V3 Nano is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.