Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgePAX 2
$150
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $100 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
PAX 2 and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $100 below PAX 2. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
27
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
PAX 2
$150
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $100 lower.
PAX 2
<60 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
PAX 2
~90 grams
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter listed unit.
PAX 2
Conduction
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
PAX 2
$150
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Device Type
PAX 2
Portable
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating Type
PAX 2
Conduction
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heat Up Time
PAX 2
<60 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
PAX 2
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Chamber Capacity
PAX 2
0.15 - 0.35 grams
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Battery Type
PAX 2
—
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
PAX 2
3000mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charge Time
PAX 2
—
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Bluetooth / App
PAX 2
Yes
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (27 differences, 0 overlaps)
| Specification | PAX 2 | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $150 | $50 |
| Device Type diff | Portable | — |
| Heating Type diff | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time diff | <60 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range diff | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Chamber Capacity diff | 0.15 - 0.35 grams | — |
| Battery Type diff | — | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity diff | 3000mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charge Time diff | — | ~50 minutes |
| Bluetooth / App diff | Yes | — |
| Dimensions diff | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm | — |
| Width diff | — | 2cm |
| Height diff | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight diff | ~90 grams | 50g |
| Brand diff | PAX Labs | — |
| Capacity diff | — | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material diff | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging diff | — | USB-C |
| Display Type diff | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback diff | — | Yes |
| Heating Time diff | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name diff | — | V3 Nano |
| Run Time diff | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time diff | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness diff | — | 2cm |
| Type diff | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
Neither is universally better. PAX 2 fits some priorities, while XMAX V3 Nano fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX V3 Nano is listed lower ($50) compared with PAX 2 ($150), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.