Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgePAX 2
$150
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $61 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
PAX 2
PAX Labs $150
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
PAX 2 and XMAX QOMO are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $61 below PAX 2. XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
19
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
14%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
PAX 2
$150
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $61 lower.
PAX 2
<60 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
PAX 2
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
PAX 2
$150
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heat Up Time
PAX 2
<60 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
PAX 2
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
PAX 2
0.15 - 0.35 grams
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Capacity
PAX 2
3000mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Dimensions
PAX 2
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
PAX 2
4 Preset Modes
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Chamber Material
PAX 2
Stainless Steel
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
Brand
PAX 2
PAX Labs
XMAX QOMO
XMAX
Release Date
PAX 2
2015
XMAX QOMO
2020
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | PAX 2 | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $150 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | <60 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.15 - 0.35 grams | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 3000mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Charge Time | — | 1-2 Hours |
| Bluetooth / App | Yes | — |
| Dimensions | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | ~90 grams | — |
| Power Adjustment | 4 Preset Modes | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | PAX Labs | XMAX |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heat-up speed: the XMAX QOMO is ready in ~20 seconds versus <60 seconds on the PAX 2, which changes whether it feels on-demand or scheduled.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $150 for the PAX 2, about $61 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the PAX 2 takes <60 seconds. That's roughly 40 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
PAX 2 has the larger chamber at 0.15 - 0.35 grams, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
PAX 2 is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX QOMO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
XMAX QOMO covers 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F), a wider band than the PAX 2 at 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F). A wider range gives you more room to dial in flavor at the low end and big clouds at the top.
Across the 22 specs we line up, they share 3 and differ on 19, an overlap of about 14%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.