Price (USD)
Close callDaVinci MIQRO
$99
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
DaVinci MIQRO
DaVinci Tech $99
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
DaVinci MIQRO and XMAX QOMO are both budget / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($99 vs $89). XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
9%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
DaVinci MIQRO
$99
XMAX QOMO
$89
Pricing is very close between both devices.
DaVinci MIQRO
~40 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
DaVinci MIQRO
Conduction
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO
$99
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heat Up Time
DaVinci MIQRO
~40 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Temperature Range
DaVinci MIQRO
170°C - 230°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO
~0.3g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
DaVinci MIQRO
Removable 18350 battery
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
DaVinci MIQRO
900mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
DaVinci MIQRO
~20-30 minutes
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charging
DaVinci MIQRO
Micro USB
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Charge Time
DaVinci MIQRO
~2 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
DaVinci MIQRO
79x34x23mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | DaVinci MIQRO | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $99 | $89 |
| Device Type | — | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~40 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 170°C - 230°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.3g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | Removable 18350 battery | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~20-30 minutes | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | Micro USB | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~2 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 79x34x23mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | 104g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital Control | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | DaVinci Tech | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | — |
| Country of Manufacture | — | China |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 5 years | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heat-up speed: the XMAX QOMO is ready in ~20 seconds versus ~40 seconds on the DaVinci MIQRO, which changes whether it feels on-demand or scheduled.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the DaVinci MIQRO takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 20 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
DaVinci MIQRO has the larger chamber at ~0.3g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
Listed prices are close: $99 for the DaVinci MIQRO versus $89 for the XMAX QOMO. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
DaVinci MIQRO uses removable 18350 battery, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX QOMO has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
DaVinci MIQRO controls heat with digital control, while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. DaVinci MIQRO gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of ~2 hours on the DaVinci MIQRO.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.