Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $200 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $200 below AUXO Celsius. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
32
Different Specs
30
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
6%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $200 lower.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Battery Type
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Width
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX V3 Nano
2cm
Height
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX V3 Nano
13.5cm
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (30 differences, 2 overlaps)
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $250 | $50 |
| Device Type diff | Portable | — |
| Heating Type diff | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | — |
| Heat Up Time diff | 6-30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Battery Type diff | — | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charging diff | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time diff | 1.5 hours | ~50 minutes |
| Width diff | — | 2cm |
| Height diff | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight diff | — | 50g |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | — |
| Oven Type diff | Quarts | — |
| Brand diff | AUXO | — |
| App Support diff | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech diff | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity diff | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material diff | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging diff | — | USB-C |
| Concentrate Support diff | Yes | — |
| Display Type diff | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | Yes |
| Heating Time diff | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material diff | Zirconia | — |
| Name diff | — | V3 Nano |
| Primary Case Material diff | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Run Time diff | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time diff | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness diff | — | 2cm |
| Type diff | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
Neither is universally better. AUXO Celsius fits some priorities, while XMAX V3 Nano fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX V3 Nano is listed lower ($50) compared with AUXO Celsius ($250), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.