Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $200 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Celsius
XMAX V3 Nano
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $200 below AUXO Celsius. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
32
Different Specs
30
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
6%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $200 lower.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Battery Type
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Width
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX V3 Nano
2cm
Height
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX V3 Nano
13.5cm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $50 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | — |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | — | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Battery Type | — | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | ~50 minutes |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | — | 50g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | — |
| Oven Type | Quarts | — |
| Brand | AUXO | — |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material | — | Stainless steel |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | Yes |
| Heating Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Name | — | V3 Nano |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Run Time | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Type | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX V3 Nano sits at $50 while the AUXO Celsius is $250, a gap of about $200 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX V3 Nano is the cheaper option at $50 compared with $250 for the AUXO Celsius, about $200 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Only the AUXO Celsius supports concentrates out of the box. The XMAX V3 Nano is dry-herb-only by design.
XMAX V3 Nano fully charges in ~50 minutes, ahead of 1.5 hours on the AUXO Celsius.
AUXO Celsius is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX V3 Nano is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Across the 32 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 30, an overlap of about 6%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.