Price (USD)
XMAX Starry V3 edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $150 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and XMAX Starry V3 are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Starry V3 is usually the lower-cost pick at $100, around $150 below AUXO Celsius. AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
25
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
4%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX Starry V3
$100
XMAX Starry V3 is typically around $150 lower.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX Starry V3
$100
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
XMAX Starry V3
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX Starry V3
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
XMAX Starry V3
~30 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX Starry V3
212°F - 464°F
Battery Type
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX Starry V3
18650
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
XMAX Starry V3
2900mAh
Battery Life
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX Starry V3
60-80 minutes
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
XMAX Starry V3
Micro USB
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
XMAX Starry V3
90-120 minutes
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (25 differences, 1 overlaps)
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | XMAX Starry V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $250 | $100 |
| Device Type diff | Portable | — |
| Heating Type diff | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time diff | 6-30 seconds | ~30 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 212°F - 464°F |
| Battery Type diff | — | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity diff | 1000mAh | 2900mAh |
| Battery Life diff | — | 60-80 minutes |
| Charging diff | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time diff | 1.5 hours | 90-120 minutes |
| Pass-Through Charging diff | — | Yes |
| Dimensions diff | — | 11 x 3.5 x 2.4 cm |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | — |
| Oven Type diff | Quarts | — |
| Brand diff | AUXO | — |
| App Support diff | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech diff | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity diff | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Chamber Material diff | — | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support diff | Yes | — |
| Display Type diff | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | Yes |
| Manufacturer diff | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material diff | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material diff | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Replaceable Battery diff | — | Yes |
Neither is universally better. AUXO Celsius fits some priorities, while XMAX Starry V3 fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX Starry V3 is listed lower ($100) compared with AUXO Celsius ($250), but live retailer pricing can change.
AUXO Celsius has the faster listed heat-up time (6-30 seconds) versus XMAX Starry V3 (~30 seconds).
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.