Price (USD)
XMAX Starry 4 edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX Starry 4
$99
XMAX Starry 4 is typically around $151 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Celsius
XMAX Starry 4
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and XMAX Starry 4 are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX Starry 4 is usually the lower-cost pick at $99, around $151 below AUXO Celsius. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
8%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX Starry 4
$99
XMAX Starry 4 is typically around $151 lower.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX Starry 4
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
XMAX Starry 4
$99
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
XMAX Starry 4
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
XMAX Starry 4
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
XMAX Starry 4
~15 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX Starry 4
100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉)
Battery Type
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX Starry 4
18650
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
XMAX Starry 4
2550mAh
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
XMAX Starry 4
—
Pass-Through Charging
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX Starry 4
Yes
Dimensions
AUXO Celsius
—
XMAX Starry 4
115.9 x 37.5 x 24mm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | XMAX Starry 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $99 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 100℃-240℃ (212℉-464℉) |
| Battery Type | — | 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 2550mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | — |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | — | 115.9 x 37.5 x 24mm |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | — |
| Oven Type | Quarts | — |
| Brand | AUXO | — |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Chamber Material | — | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | Yes |
| Manufacturer | — | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
| Replaceable Battery | — | Yes |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the XMAX Starry 4 sits at $99 while the AUXO Celsius is $250, a gap of about $151 that puts them in different buying brackets.
XMAX Starry 4 is the cheaper option at $99 compared with $250 for the AUXO Celsius, about $151 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
AUXO Celsius uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the XMAX Starry 4 uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Yes, only the XMAX Starry 4 supports pass-through charging. The AUXO Celsius has to finish charging before you can use it.
Heat-up times are very close: 6-30 seconds on the AUXO Celsius and ~15 seconds on the XMAX Starry 4. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
Only the AUXO Celsius supports concentrates out of the box. The XMAX Starry 4 is dry-herb-only by design.
Across the 25 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 23, an overlap of about 8%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.