Price (USD)
PAX 2 edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
PAX 2
$150
PAX 2 is typically around $100 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and PAX 2 are both portable / conduction vaporizers, but they target different priorities. PAX 2 is usually the lower-cost pick at $150, around $100 below AUXO Celsius. AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
1
Overall Overlap
5%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
PAX 2
$150
PAX 2 is typically around $100 lower.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
PAX 2
<60 seconds
AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX 2
~90 grams
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
PAX 2
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
PAX 2
$150
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
PAX 2
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
PAX 2
<60 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX 2
182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F)
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX 2
0.15 - 0.35 grams
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
PAX 2
3000mAh
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
PAX 2
—
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
PAX 2
—
Bluetooth / App
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX 2
Yes
Dimensions
AUXO Celsius
—
PAX 2
98mm x 31mm x 22mm
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (21 differences, 1 overlaps)
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | PAX 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $250 | $150 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type diff | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time diff | 6-30 seconds | <60 seconds |
| Temperature Range diff | — | 182°C - 215°C (260°F - 420°F) |
| Chamber Capacity diff | — | 0.15 - 0.35 grams |
| Battery Capacity diff | 1000mAh | 3000mAh |
| Charging diff | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time diff | 1.5 hours | — |
| Bluetooth / App diff | — | Yes |
| Dimensions diff | — | 98mm x 31mm x 22mm |
| Weight diff | — | ~90 grams |
| Power Adjustment diff | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | — |
| Oven Type diff | Quarts | — |
| Brand diff | AUXO | PAX Labs |
| App Support diff | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech diff | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity diff | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support diff | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback diff | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material diff | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material diff | Aluminum Alloy | — |
Neither is universally better. AUXO Celsius fits some priorities, while PAX 2 fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
PAX 2 is listed lower ($150) compared with AUXO Celsius ($250), but live retailer pricing can change.
AUXO Celsius has the faster listed heat-up time (6-30 seconds) versus PAX 2 (<60 seconds).
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.