Price (USD)
DaVinci MIQRO edgeAUXO Celsius
$250
DaVinci MIQRO
$99
DaVinci MIQRO is typically around $151 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
AUXO Celsius
DaVinci MIQRO
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
AUXO Celsius and DaVinci MIQRO are both conduction / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. DaVinci MIQRO is usually the lower-cost pick at $99, around $151 below AUXO Celsius. AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
20
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
0
Overall Overlap
0%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
AUXO Celsius
$250
DaVinci MIQRO
$99
DaVinci MIQRO is typically around $151 lower.
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
DaVinci MIQRO
~40 seconds
AUXO Celsius has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
DaVinci MIQRO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
AUXO Celsius
$250
DaVinci MIQRO
$99
Device Type
AUXO Celsius
Portable
DaVinci MIQRO
—
Heating Type
AUXO Celsius
Hybrid (Primarily Conduction)
DaVinci MIQRO
Conduction
Heat Up Time
AUXO Celsius
6-30 seconds
DaVinci MIQRO
~40 seconds
Temperature Range
AUXO Celsius
—
DaVinci MIQRO
170°C - 230°C
Chamber Capacity
AUXO Celsius
—
DaVinci MIQRO
~0.3g
Battery Type
AUXO Celsius
—
DaVinci MIQRO
Removable 18350 battery
Battery Capacity
AUXO Celsius
1000mAh
DaVinci MIQRO
—
Charging
AUXO Celsius
USB-C
DaVinci MIQRO
Micro USB
Charge Time
AUXO Celsius
1.5 hours
DaVinci MIQRO
~2 hours
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | AUXO Celsius | DaVinci MIQRO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $250 | $99 |
| Device Type | Portable | — |
| Heating Type | Hybrid (Primarily Conduction) | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | 6-30 seconds | ~40 seconds |
| Temperature Range | — | 170°C - 230°C |
| Chamber Capacity | — | ~0.3g |
| Battery Type | — | Removable 18350 battery |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | — |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hours | ~2 hours |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 4 Stages (and an app controlled custom mode) | Digital Control |
| Oven Type | Quarts | — |
| Brand | AUXO | DaVinci Tech |
| App Support | Yes | — |
| Battery Tech | Lithium-ion | — |
| Capacity | 0.3g dry herbs or 0.05g when using concentrates | — |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Mouthpiece Material | Zirconia | — |
| Primary Case Material | Aluminum Alloy | — |
The biggest practical difference is price tier: the DaVinci MIQRO sits at $99 while the AUXO Celsius is $250, a gap of about $151 that puts them in different buying brackets.
DaVinci MIQRO is the cheaper option at $99 compared with $250 for the AUXO Celsius, about $151 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
AUXO Celsius reaches session-ready temperature in 6-30 seconds, while the DaVinci MIQRO takes ~40 seconds. That's roughly 22 seconds quicker on the AUXO Celsius, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
AUXO Celsius uses hybrid (primarily conduction) heating, while the DaVinci MIQRO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
Only the AUXO Celsius supports concentrates out of the box. The DaVinci MIQRO is dry-herb-only by design.
AUXO Celsius fully charges in 1.5 hours, ahead of ~2 hours on the DaVinci MIQRO.
AUXO Celsius is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the DaVinci MIQRO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.