Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano edgeXMAX V3 Nano
$50
YLLVAPE Angus
$169
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $119 lower.


Side-by-side vaporizer comparison including specs, pricing context, and decision guidance.
XMAX V3 Nano and YLLVAPE Angus are both electronic / portable vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX V3 Nano is usually the lower-cost pick at $50, around $119 below YLLVAPE Angus. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
23
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
12%
Shared Traits
Quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
YLLVAPE Angus
$169
XMAX V3 Nano is typically around $119 lower.
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
YLLVAPE Angus
—
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
YLLVAPE Angus
$169
Temperature Range
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
YLLVAPE Angus
—
Battery Type
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
YLLVAPE Angus
2x 18650 (user replaceable)
Battery Capacity
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
YLLVAPE Angus
—
Charge Time
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
YLLVAPE Angus
—
Width
XMAX V3 Nano
2cm
YLLVAPE Angus
—
Height
XMAX V3 Nano
13.5cm
YLLVAPE Angus
—
Weight
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
YLLVAPE Angus
—
Power Adjustment
XMAX V3 Nano
—
YLLVAPE Angus
Preset - 5 Stages
Brand
XMAX V3 Nano
—
YLLVAPE Angus
YLLVAPE
Direct comparison of shared and unique specifications from each device profile. (23 differences, 3 overlaps)
| Specification | XMAX V3 Nano | YLLVAPE Angus |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) diff | $50 | $169 |
| Temperature Range diff | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) | — |
| Battery Type diff | Internal (non-swappable) | 2x 18650 (user replaceable) |
| Battery Capacity diff | 1000mAh | — |
| Charge Time diff | ~50 minutes | — |
| Width diff | 2cm | — |
| Height diff | 13.5cm | — |
| Weight diff | 50g | — |
| Power Adjustment diff | — | Preset - 5 Stages |
| Brand diff | — | YLLVAPE |
| Bulb Life diff | — | Up to 2000 hours |
| Capacity diff | ~0.1g | — |
| Chamber Material | Stainless steel | Stainless Steel |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Display Type diff | None | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | Yes |
| Heating Element diff | — | Halogen Bulb |
| Heating Time diff | 30 seconds | 60-90 seconds |
| Manufacturer diff | TopGreen Technology Co | — |
| Name diff | V3 Nano | — |
| Oven Capacity diff | — | 0.25g |
| Run Time diff | 5-6 sessions | 6-10 sessions per charge |
| Session Time diff | 3 minutes | — |
| Temperature Presets diff | — | 180°C/356°F, 190°C/375°F, 200°C/395°F. 210°C/410°F, 220°C/428°F |
| Thickness diff | 2cm | — |
| Type diff | Hybrid (primarily convection) | Portable |
Neither is universally better. XMAX V3 Nano fits some priorities, while YLLVAPE Angus fits others. This side-by-side comparison highlights the tradeoffs so you can choose based on your own use-case.
XMAX V3 Nano is listed lower ($50) compared with YLLVAPE Angus ($169), but live retailer pricing can change.
Published heat-up data differs by source, so practical session feel may matter more than one raw number.
Jump into the full comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.