Price (USD)
Close callXMAX V3 Nano
$50
XVape Aria
$60
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
XMAX V3 Nano
XVape Aria
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XMAX V3 Nano and XVape Aria are both budget / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($50 vs $60). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
2
Overall Overlap
8%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XVape Aria
$60
Pricing is very close between both devices.
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Aria
~15 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
XVape Aria
135 grams
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter listed unit.
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Aria
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
XVape Aria
$60
Heating Type
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Aria
Conduction
Heat Up Time
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Aria
~15 seconds
Temperature Range
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
XVape Aria
100 - 240 (212°F - 464°F)
Battery Type
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
XVape Aria
—
Battery Capacity
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
XVape Aria
2600mAh
Battery Life
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Aria
4 - 8 sessions
Charging
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Aria
Micro USB
Charge Time
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
XVape Aria
2 - 3 hours
Pass-Through Charging
XMAX V3 Nano
—
XVape Aria
Yes
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XMAX V3 Nano | XVape Aria |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $50 | $60 |
| Heating Type | — | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) | 100 - 240 (212°F - 464°F) |
| Battery Type | Internal (non-swappable) | — |
| Battery Capacity | 1000mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 4 - 8 sessions |
| Charging | — | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~50 minutes | 2 - 3 hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Width | 2cm | — |
| Height | 13.5cm | — |
| Weight | 50g | 135 grams |
| Power Adjustment | — | Digital |
| Capacity | ~0.1g | — |
| Chamber Material | Stainless steel | Ceramic |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Display Type | None | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | Yes |
| Heating Time | 30 seconds | — |
| Manufacturer | TopGreen Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name | V3 Nano | — |
| Run Time | 5-6 sessions | — |
| Session Time | 3 minutes | — |
| Thickness | 2cm | — |
| Type | Hybrid (primarily convection) | — |
The biggest practical difference is portability: the XMAX V3 Nano is roughly 85g lighter than the XVape Aria, which adds up over a day of pocket carry.
XMAX V3 Nano is the lighter unit at 50g, around 85g less than the XVape Aria at 135 grams. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Yes, only the XVape Aria supports pass-through charging. The XMAX V3 Nano has to finish charging before you can use it.
Listed prices are close: $50 for the XMAX V3 Nano versus $60 for the XVape Aria. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX V3 Nano fully charges in ~50 minutes, ahead of 2 - 3 hours on the XVape Aria.
XVape Aria is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX V3 Nano is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Across the 26 specs we line up, they share 2 and differ on 24, an overlap of about 8%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.