Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeXMAX QOMO
$89
Zeus Arc GT
$180
XMAX QOMO is typically around $91 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
Zeus Arc GT
Zeus Arsenal $180
XMAX QOMO and Zeus Arc GT are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $91 below Zeus Arc GT. Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
22
Different Specs
18
Shared Specs
4
Overall Overlap
18%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX QOMO
$89
Zeus Arc GT
$180
XMAX QOMO is typically around $91 lower.
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Zeus Arc GT
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO
$89
Zeus Arc GT
$180
Temperature Range
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Zeus Arc GT
365°F - 437°F
Chamber Capacity
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Zeus Arc GT
~0.3 grams
Battery Capacity
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Zeus Arc GT
3500mAh
Battery Life
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Zeus Arc GT
~90 minutes
Charging
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
Zeus Arc GT
Micro USB
Dimensions
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Zeus Arc GT
86x42x22mm
Chamber Material
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
Zeus Arc GT
Gold-Plated
Brand
XMAX QOMO
XMAX
Zeus Arc GT
Zeus Arsenal
Release Date
XMAX QOMO
2020
Zeus Arc GT
2018
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XMAX QOMO | Zeus Arc GT |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $89 | $180 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) | 365°F - 437°F |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.15g | ~0.3 grams |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 1350mAh | 3500mAh |
| Battery Life | 10-20 Sessions | ~90 minutes |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 1-2 Hours | — |
| Dimensions | 127x50x29.6mm | 86x42x22mm |
| Weight | — | ~125g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 3 Stages | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Gold-Plated |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | XMAX | Zeus Arsenal |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Manufacturer | TopGreen Technology Co | — |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2018 |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 3 years |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 18 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $180 for the Zeus Arc GT, about $91 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
Zeus Arc GT has the larger chamber at ~0.3 grams, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
XMAX QOMO's spec sheet lists 10-20 Sessions; the Zeus Arc GT lists ~90 minutes. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
XMAX QOMO charges over USB-C; the Zeus Arc GT uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Across the 22 specs we line up, they share 4 and differ on 18, an overlap of about 18%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.