Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeXMAX QOMO
$89
YLLVAPE Angus
$169
XMAX QOMO is typically around $80 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
YLLVAPE Angus
YLLVAPE $169
XMAX QOMO and YLLVAPE Angus are both portable / electronic vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $80 below YLLVAPE Angus. XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile, which can matter for shorter sessions.
Specs Compared
27
Different Specs
24
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
11%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX QOMO
$89
YLLVAPE Angus
$169
XMAX QOMO is typically around $80 lower.
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
YLLVAPE Angus
60-90 seconds
XMAX QOMO has the quicker listed heat-up profile.
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
YLLVAPE Angus
Hybrid
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO
$89
YLLVAPE Angus
$169
Heating Type
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
YLLVAPE Angus
Hybrid
Heat Up Time
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
YLLVAPE Angus
60-90 seconds
Temperature Range
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
YLLVAPE Angus
180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F)
Chamber Capacity
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
YLLVAPE Angus
0.25g
Battery Type
XMAX QOMO
Internal
YLLVAPE Angus
2x 18650 (user replaceable)
Battery Life
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
YLLVAPE Angus
7-10 sessions
Dimensions
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
YLLVAPE Angus
133x76x31mm
Power Adjustment
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
YLLVAPE Angus
Preset - 5 Stages
Chamber Material
XMAX QOMO
Ceramic
YLLVAPE Angus
Stainless Steel
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XMAX QOMO | YLLVAPE Angus |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $89 | $169 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Hybrid |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | 60-90 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) | 180°C - 220°C (356°F - 428°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.15g | 0.25g |
| Battery Type | Internal | 2x 18650 (user replaceable) |
| Battery Capacity | 1350mAh | — |
| Battery Life | 10-20 Sessions | 7-10 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | 1-2 Hours | — |
| Dimensions | 127x50x29.6mm | 133x76x31mm |
| Weight | — | 260g |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 3 Stages | Preset - 5 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Stainless Steel |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | XMAX | YLLVAPE |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | Yes |
| Bulb Life | — | Up to 2000 hours |
| Country of Manufacture | China | — |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Heating Element | — | Halogen Bulb |
| Manufacturer | TopGreen Technology Co | — |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Temperature Presets | — | 180°C/356°F, 190°C/375°F, 200°C/395°F. 210°C/410°F, 220°C/428°F |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: XMAX QOMO runs conduction while YLLVAPE Angus runs hybrid. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $169 for the YLLVAPE Angus, about $80 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XMAX QOMO reaches session-ready temperature in ~20 seconds, while the YLLVAPE Angus takes 60-90 seconds. That's roughly 55 seconds quicker on the XMAX QOMO, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
XMAX QOMO uses conduction heating, while the YLLVAPE Angus uses hybrid. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
YLLVAPE Angus has the larger chamber at 0.25g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
YLLVAPE Angus uses 2x 18650 (user replaceable), so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX QOMO has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
XMAX QOMO's spec sheet lists 10-20 Sessions; the YLLVAPE Angus lists 7-10 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.