Price (USD)
XVape Aria edgeXMAX QOMO
$89
XVape Aria
$60
XVape Aria is typically around $29 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
XVape Aria
XVape $60
XMAX QOMO and XVape Aria are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XVape Aria is usually the lower-cost pick at $60, around $29 below XMAX QOMO. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
20
Shared Specs
6
Overall Overlap
23%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX QOMO
$89
XVape Aria
$60
XVape Aria is typically around $29 lower.
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XVape Aria
~15 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
XVape Aria
Conduction
Both devices use a similar heating approach.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO
$89
XVape Aria
$60
Heat Up Time
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
XVape Aria
~15 seconds
Temperature Range
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
XVape Aria
100 - 240 (212°F - 464°F)
Battery Type
XMAX QOMO
Internal
XVape Aria
Internal 18650
Battery Capacity
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
XVape Aria
2600mAh
Battery Life
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
XVape Aria
4 - 8 sessions
Charging
XMAX QOMO
USB-C
XVape Aria
Micro USB
Charge Time
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
XVape Aria
2 - 3 hours
Dimensions
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
XVape Aria
118x34x22mm
Power Adjustment
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
XVape Aria
Digital
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XMAX QOMO | XVape Aria |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $89 | $60 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Conduction | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) | 100 - 240 (212°F - 464°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | 0.15g | — |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 1350mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | 10-20 Sessions | 4 - 8 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | 1-2 Hours | 2 - 3 hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | 127x50x29.6mm | 118x34x22mm |
| Weight | — | 135 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 3 Stages | Digital |
| Chamber Material | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | XMAX | XVape |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | No |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | TopGreen Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
| Session Style | — | Session |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 20 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
XVape Aria is the cheaper option at $60 compared with $89 for the XMAX QOMO, about $29 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XVape Aria reaches session-ready temperature in ~15 seconds, while the XMAX QOMO takes ~20 seconds. That's roughly 5 seconds quicker on the XVape Aria, which is useful if you want shorter, on-demand sessions.
XMAX QOMO controls heat with modular - 3 stages, while the XVape Aria uses digital. XVape Aria gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX QOMO fully charges in 1-2 Hours, ahead of 2 - 3 hours on the XVape Aria.
XVape Aria is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX QOMO is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
XMAX QOMO's spec sheet lists 10-20 Sessions; the XVape Aria lists 4 - 8 sessions. The two manufacturers measure battery life differently here, so direct comparison isn't straightforward.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.