Price (USD)
Close callXMAX OONT
$50
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
XMAX OONT
XMAX V3 Nano
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XMAX OONT and XMAX V3 Nano are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($50 vs $50). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
25
Different Specs
22
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
12%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX OONT
$50
XMAX V3 Nano
$50
Pricing is very close between both devices.
XMAX OONT
~20 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
XMAX OONT
—
XMAX V3 Nano
50g
Weight is close enough that portability is likely similar.
XMAX OONT
Conduction
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Heating Type
XMAX OONT
Conduction
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Heat Up Time
XMAX OONT
~20 seconds
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Temperature Range
XMAX OONT
180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉)
XMAX V3 Nano
200 - 220C (single temp setting)
Battery Type
XMAX OONT
Internal 18500
XMAX V3 Nano
Internal (non-swappable)
Battery Capacity
XMAX OONT
1500mAh
XMAX V3 Nano
1000mAh
Charging
XMAX OONT
USB-C
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Charge Time
XMAX OONT
—
XMAX V3 Nano
~50 minutes
Dimensions
XMAX OONT
51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm
XMAX V3 Nano
—
Width
XMAX OONT
—
XMAX V3 Nano
2cm
Height
XMAX OONT
—
XMAX V3 Nano
13.5cm
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XMAX OONT | XMAX V3 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $50 | $50 |
| Heating Type | Conduction | — |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | — |
| Temperature Range | 180℃-220℃ (356℉-428℉) | 200 - 220C (single temp setting) |
| Battery Type | Internal 18500 | Internal (non-swappable) |
| Battery Capacity | 1500mAh | 1000mAh |
| Charging | USB-C | — |
| Charge Time | — | ~50 minutes |
| Dimensions | 51.14 x 27.40 x 74.5mm | — |
| Width | — | 2cm |
| Height | — | 13.5cm |
| Weight | — | 50g |
| Capacity | — | ~0.1g |
| Chamber Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless steel |
| Charging | — | USB-C |
| Display Type | — | None |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Heating Time | — | 30 seconds |
| Manufacturer | TopGreen Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Name | — | V3 Nano |
| Replaceable Battery | No | — |
| Run Time | — | 5-6 sessions |
| Session Time | — | 3 minutes |
| Thickness | — | 2cm |
| Type | — | Hybrid (primarily convection) |
There's no single headline gap. The differences are spread across 22 smaller spec rows rather than concentrated in one place. The spec table below marks each row that differs.
Listed prices are close: $50 for the XMAX OONT versus $50 for the XMAX V3 Nano. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX V3 Nano uses internal (non-swappable), so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX OONT has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
XMAX OONT is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX V3 Nano is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
Yes, both are from XMAX, which usually means similar build quality, support, and accessory ecosystems.
Across the 25 specs we line up, they share 3 and differ on 22, an overlap of about 12%. The differences are concentrated in the areas the spec table highlights with a marker.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.