Price (USD)
Close callXMAX Daboo
$49
XVape Aria
$60
Pricing is very close between both devices.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XMAX Daboo
XMAX $49
XVape Aria
XVape $60
XMAX Daboo and XVape Aria are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. Their listed prices are close ($49 vs $60). Session style, airflow, and extraction behavior will matter more than raw spec sheet numbers here.
Specs Compared
32
Different Specs
29
Shared Specs
3
Overall Overlap
9%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XMAX Daboo
$49
XVape Aria
$60
Pricing is very close between both devices.
XMAX Daboo
~231g
XVape Aria
135 grams
XVape Aria is the lighter listed unit.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
XMAX Daboo
$49
XVape Aria
$60
Temperature Range
XMAX Daboo
285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F)
XVape Aria
100 - 240 (212°F - 464°F)
Battery Type
XMAX Daboo
Internal
XVape Aria
Internal 18650
Battery Capacity
XMAX Daboo
650mAh
XVape Aria
2600mAh
Charging
XMAX Daboo
USB-C
XVape Aria
Micro USB
Charge Time
XMAX Daboo
~1 Hour
XVape Aria
2 - 3 hours
Dimensions
XMAX Daboo
166.5x38.5x22mm
XVape Aria
118x34x22mm
Weight
XMAX Daboo
~231g
XVape Aria
135 grams
Power Adjustment
XMAX Daboo
Modular - 3 Stages
XVape Aria
Digital
Brand
XMAX Daboo
XMAX
XVape Aria
XVape
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XMAX Daboo | XVape Aria |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $49 | $60 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | — | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | — | ~15 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 285 - 360 C (545 - 680 F) | 100 - 240 (212°F - 464°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | N/A | — |
| Battery Type | Internal | Internal 18650 |
| Battery Capacity | 650mAh | 2600mAh |
| Battery Life | — | 4 - 8 sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | Micro USB |
| Charge Time | ~1 Hour | 2 - 3 hours |
| Pass-Through Charging | — | Yes |
| Dimensions | 166.5x38.5x22mm | 118x34x22mm |
| Weight | ~231g | 135 grams |
| Power Adjustment | Modular - 3 Stages | Digital |
| Chamber Material | — | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | Yes | — |
| Brand | XMAX | XVape |
| 510 Compatible | Yes | — |
| Adjustable Airflow | — | No |
| Cartridge Resistance Support | 0.5-2.0Ω | — |
| Coil Type | Porous Quartz Coil | — |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | — | OLED |
| Haptic Feedback | — | Yes |
| Manufacturer | TopGreen Technology Co | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Operating Voltage | 3.3-4.2V | — |
| Recommended Charger | 5V/1A | — |
| Release Date | — | 2019 |
| Session Style | Both | Session |
| Warranty | 6 months | 1 year |
| Water Filtration | Yes | — |
The biggest practical difference is portability: the XVape Aria is roughly 96g lighter than the XMAX Daboo, which adds up over a day of pocket carry.
XVape Aria is the lighter unit at 135 grams, around 96g less than the XMAX Daboo at ~231g. The lighter device is easier to carry and pocket day-to-day.
Listed prices are close: $49 for the XMAX Daboo versus $60 for the XVape Aria. Day-to-day price will likely come down to whichever retailer is running a promotion.
XMAX Daboo controls heat with modular - 3 stages, while the XVape Aria uses digital. XVape Aria gives you finer per-degree control.
XMAX Daboo fully charges in ~1 Hour, ahead of 2 - 3 hours on the XVape Aria.
XVape Aria is the better pick if low-profile use matters. It's tagged as stealth or pocket-friendly in our database, while the XMAX Daboo is more conspicuous in hand and harder to keep out of sight.
XMAX Daboo charges over USB-C; the XVape Aria uses a Micro USB port. USB-C means one fewer cable to keep around if your phone and laptop already use it.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.