Price (USD)
XMAX QOMO edgeXLUX Roffu
$129
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $40 lower.
Vaporizer Comparison
Side-by-side specs, pricing context, and clear decision guidance.
XLUX Roffu
XVAPE $129
XMAX QOMO
XMAX $89
XLUX Roffu and XMAX QOMO are both portable / budget vaporizers, but they target different priorities. XMAX QOMO is usually the lower-cost pick at $89, around $40 below XLUX Roffu. Heat-up speed is broadly similar between the two.
Specs Compared
26
Different Specs
21
Shared Specs
5
Overall Overlap
19%
Shared Traits
A quick snapshot of the specs people usually care about first.
XLUX Roffu
$129
XMAX QOMO
$89
XMAX QOMO is typically around $40 lower.
XLUX Roffu
~20 seconds
XMAX QOMO
~20 seconds
Both devices are in a similar heat-up range.
XLUX Roffu
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Heating style differs, which can impact flavor and extraction behavior.
Top specs where these two devices diverge.
Price (USD)
XLUX Roffu
$129
XMAX QOMO
$89
Heating Type
XLUX Roffu
Convection
XMAX QOMO
Conduction
Temperature Range
XLUX Roffu
100°C - 220°C
XMAX QOMO
280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F)
Chamber Capacity
XLUX Roffu
~0.2g
XMAX QOMO
0.15g
Battery Type
XLUX Roffu
18650
XMAX QOMO
Internal
Battery Capacity
XLUX Roffu
2600mAh
XMAX QOMO
1350mAh
Battery Life
XLUX Roffu
~20 sessions
XMAX QOMO
10-20 Sessions
Charge Time
XLUX Roffu
~3 hours
XMAX QOMO
1-2 Hours
Dimensions
XLUX Roffu
115.5x40.5x25mm
XMAX QOMO
127x50x29.6mm
Power Adjustment
XLUX Roffu
Digital (precise)
XMAX QOMO
Modular - 3 Stages
Direct comparison of every spec from each device profile.
| Specification | XLUX Roffu | XMAX QOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $129 | $89 |
| Device Type | Portable | Portable |
| Heating Type | Convection | Conduction |
| Heat Up Time | ~20 seconds | ~20 seconds |
| Temperature Range | 100°C - 220°C | 280°C - 350°C (536°F - 662°F) |
| Chamber Capacity | ~0.2g | 0.15g |
| Battery Type | 18650 | Internal |
| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh | 1350mAh |
| Battery Life | ~20 sessions | 10-20 Sessions |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Charge Time | ~3 hours | 1-2 Hours |
| Dimensions | 115.5x40.5x25mm | 127x50x29.6mm |
| Weight | ~166g | — |
| Power Adjustment | Digital (precise) | Modular - 3 Stages |
| Chamber Material | Glass | Ceramic |
| Concentrate Support | — | Yes |
| Brand | XVAPE | XMAX |
| Adjustable Airflow | No | — |
| Country of Manufacture | China | China |
| Display Type | Color OLED | — |
| Haptic Feedback | Yes | — |
| Manufacturer | XVAPE | TopGreen Technology Co |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
| Replaceable Battery | Yes | — |
| Session Style | Both | — |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
The biggest practical difference is heating approach: XLUX Roffu runs convection while XMAX QOMO runs conduction. That changes flavor delivery, vapor density, and how the device responds to slow versus fast draws.
XMAX QOMO is the cheaper option at $89 compared with $129 for the XLUX Roffu, about $40 less. Live retailer pricing can shift, so confirm before buying.
XLUX Roffu uses convection heating, while the XMAX QOMO uses conduction. Heating style influences flavor profile, vapor density, and how forgiving the device is to draw technique.
XLUX Roffu has the larger chamber at ~0.2g, versus 0.15g on the XMAX QOMO. A bigger bowl means fewer reloads on long sessions; a smaller one suits microdosing and quicker bowls.
XLUX Roffu uses 18650, so you can carry spares for back-to-back days. The XMAX QOMO has a built-in battery you can't swap on the go.
Heat-up times are very close: ~20 seconds on the XLUX Roffu and ~20 seconds on the XMAX QOMO. The real-world difference will be hard to notice mid-session.
XLUX Roffu controls heat with digital (precise), while the XMAX QOMO uses modular - 3 stages. XLUX Roffu gives you finer per-degree control.
Jump into the comparison hub to pick any two devices and open a canonical side-by-side page.